Anybody else slightly bummed that that the $4813 price tag wasn’t a little closer to, I don’t know, a certain number that appeared over and over throughout Lost? (The numbers were 4 8 15 16 23 42.) Would’ve been another cool tie-in.
Anybody else slightly bummed that that the $4813 price tag wasn’t a little closer to, I don’t know, a certain number that appeared over and over throughout Lost? (The numbers were 4 8 15 16 23 42.) Would’ve been another cool tie-in.