I agree with the assessment that it is "weird." Perhaps other people read a negative, judging definition into it but even if that does bother some people, "weird" also means out of the ordinary. That's a factual statement (if there are actually more 29 y/o non-virgins than virgins). It's fair to infer that it is weird…

"This old school mentality that a woman's sexuality is inherently intertwined with all of her accomplishments is tired and, quite frankly, bullshit."

Smith needs to fuck off. Especially with that classless slash at Richards after the game winning goal and his slash at the back of Brown's legs when Brown didn't even enter the crease in game 2. Whine some more, bitch.

[www.amazon.com] are different keys available, but it's the one I have and use.

Truth. See: Marcus Bachmann

Antonym pretty much summed it up. "States' rights" can be a guise for letting local prejudices/fucked-up shit prevail. The federal government plays a role in tempering crazy bull shit because it, in essence, averages out views through representatives drawn from all over the country. As for the fear of the executive…

Educashun is leberal eleetizm.

Does this work for rain as well? They show a rain cloud in a graphic at their site but there's no mention of it working for rain. (The snow function is useless in Los Angeles.) Rain adds at least 20-30 minutes to a commute with no rain-related accidents. Accidents will add an hour.

There may have been battery by the employee but those jeans are an assault on the eyes.

@Cory Cross - Male Model Extraordinaire: That last song from the linked thread is from their album "In Absentia." It's actually a good introductory album.

@Cory Cross - Male Model Extraordinaire: Opeth. Years ago, I thought it was a stereotypically bad death metal band that was trying too hard. Then I felt like a complete dumbass after listening to "Ghost Reveries" and "Deliverance." And now they're one of my top 5 bands. The same goes for their B.F.F. prog-rock band…

Falcons chokefest: [ON] | OFF

@ToddReesingsTurfFacial: When she's right, she's right.

@Rotoman: We'll see. They managed well in their regular season meeting and now they have Starks to at least put forth an adequate running effort.

@Rotoman: You mad? You mad.

EYAHAAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...@!!!!!!!

@Peteski: SURPRISE!

@BirdLaw: I guess if there is OT (which there won't as they'll either lose or win on the last drive) they'll have one less timeout? It's absurd.

Player: Clay Matthews

@gulag: I would want to see Manning face tonight too if I didn't hate the Jets slightly more.