gmoney06
Gmoney
gmoney06

The money that got offset was only there due to a business tax, which was specifically cut after the lottery. So really, education used to be paid for by big business, and now it’s paid for by the poor who buy lottery tickets

Yes, my generation received participation trophies. But who do you think bought them and gave them to us? Your generation.

Do you not know basic driving etiquette? Don’t cruise in the passing lane. It doesn’t matter if you’re doing the speed limit, the left lane is for passing. “According to California driving laws,” it’s also illegal to obstruct traffic. In other states it’s beyond etiquette, you’ll get pulled over if someone passes you

You should be swapping your wipers every 6-9 months anyways, before your rainy season. Right before winter if you’re in a drought state

Now playing

Pop music is 3-4 minutes long, with a repeated melody, repeated hook, repeated chorus. That repetition is what makes it infectious. You can do the same thing with classical music by listening to the same piece over and over, especially in small chunks. This is a 2.5 min intro (“Prelude” technically) to a Bach Cello

You are SofaKing insane. That 2.5 day train ride from Emeryville nearly cost me my marriage. The only people I’ve ever recommended it to are those whose relationships I’m trying to sabotage. 

Roe likely won’t be formally overturned, as it doesn’t need to. The Constitutional Right to Abortion isn’t outright, but rather simply prevents States from putting any “undue burdens” in your way. What will likely happen is Alabama (insert similar ass-backwards state here) will pass a draconian law that in essence

There’s a fundamental flaw to your position: you do not inherently possess any rights. And any rights (whether granted Constitutionally or statutorily) are subject to terms and conditions, and can be rescinded or outright revoked. That’s how a society works. 

O. RLY?

Not to escalate so quickly, but everything the Gestapo did was “legal.

There are no unlimited, unqualified rights. All of them are subject to certain rules and restrictions. You have a right to free speech, but can’t yell “fire” in a crowded room. 2A is no different.

You are absolutely correct. SCOTUS did in fact rule that the right to bear and keep arms applied to individuals. They have also ruled that black people are property and don’t have standing to sue. They have also upheld the internment of US citizens of Japanese descent.

TL:DR- both sides are wrong. The 2A is about armed State law enforcement groups, not the military, and not a personal right of Citizens to be armed. Search your feelings, you know it to be true.

Restrictions on alienation are very much void as against public policy. Ford has neither possession, nor title of the vehicle.If you want to prevent someone from transferring a vehicle for 2 years, you lease it.

Alienation is allowed when it’s not truly alienation. E.g. a non-compete when buying a business and its good will. But for personal property? They’ve upheld restraints in certain narrow situations, e.g. when title of the asset was never transferred from Seller 1 to Buyer 1; or when the asset is being used as

Those aren’t facts. That’s a list located with a 30 second google search.

Ok... you’ve demonstrated you know how to use Google, but didn’t actually say anything useful.

Meh, good luck making this enforceable. Just because two people agreed to it, doesn’t mean it’s valid. Once you’ve sold off private property, you’re very limited to the control you get to exercise over it. You don’t own it anymore, you have neither title nor possession. And this isn’t some sort of license where you

Then you sue the third party. Also have to establish that the new buyer knew of the contract; and subsequently prevented performance.

No one cares. Are you kids well-behaved and invisible in restaurants? Good, they should be, and you’re doing the job you’re supposed to. It’s the other fucknut parents who give you a bad name. Be mad at them. And you’re going to say that kids aren’t the vast majority of disruptive patrons in a restaurant?