The ONLY valid argument I’ve heard for back roll is when you have a cat that likes to spin the TP roll.

This seems more to just be about having gay nonplayer characters in the official campaigns, not encouraging players to make their characters gay. That said, a DM can make the NPCs whatever they want, regardless of what they are in the campaign by default.

I suppose this is talking more about the pre-designed adventure paths and not home-brewed campaigns but I’ve always found D&D (and table top games as a whole) to actually be very LGBTQ positive and accepting. If I remember correctly, the player handbook (back before the 5th ed mentioned here :) ) specifically mentions…

Maybe I’m wrong with this but... Isnt D&D basically what ever the players want it to be? Or is this some unwritten rule that if you play official stories you have to follow it by the letter?

Note for myself, never accept to be cryogened. Everyone dies except one, every. single. time.

I think I speak for all of us when I say: Oh come the FUCK on!

I think the line is crossed when it goes from “hey play pacifist first time through or else you get locked out of the best ending” to “UM EXCUSE I’M NOT WATCHING THIS BECAUSE HE’S NOT DOING PACIFIST.” The first is advice; the second is demanding.

I will never get how people can get this hung up over fictional characters.

I don’t get this at all.

Ok, Anton. Answer this for your players and investors:

Actually, my observation is that a naked d player economy trading digital goods for crypto currency transaction on a cell phone is *so obviously* going to be a money laundering vector that it can’t have escaped the notice of anyone with the mathematics skills to be a game developer or business owner.

A mobile MMO made by a Russian company with funding by Chinese investors, who are open and proud about the game’s entire model being pay-to-win with real dollars.

What could *possibly* be more appealing?!

I hope we all see the irony in someone winning a “For Honor” competition in a strikingly dishonorable fashion. Not just the exploit but that after winning he shot off a “wow this was so easy, I didn’t even practice,” line. Honestly I’m half inclined to think it was intentional.

Cue Anime News Network weaboo dipshits storming in here and giving you grief because “it isn’t anime.”

Well I adored the show..the dialogue is hit or miss but I’ve been watching anime for the better part of 25 years. Clunky dialogue doesn’t shake me much. It did feel very...Whedon-like. Depending on how you like Whedon that could be make or break. Castlevania very much reminded me why I hated the 2016-17 Berserk…

Yeah, it baffles me as well. there is literally no reason to write them out. They weren’t annoying or obnoxious characters no one liked, pretty much everyone enjoyed them. They are a central part of pretty much all the earlier pokemon seasons. Its so weird to write them out of a movie retelling the original story.…

This is not cool. Brock and Misty are as much a part of the original series as Ash.

It really sounds like your complaints are mostly to do with the genre and type of game that FFXIV is. It is an MMO with an (admittedly quite slow) MMO combat system that doesn’t reinvent or innovate, but is extremely tight and functional. It is also a JRPG, and in typical JRPG fashion it has endless fetch quests and…

What do you dislike about it? I do sometimes wish the combat was a little less MMO-y, and the interface on PS4 is a bit of a mess, but I feel like it’s a pretty great game for anyone who digs Final Fantasy.

Pokemon Go is still going?