The article said the whole thing started at 10PM, he’s saying it was rush hour.

Yeah, didn’t mean to imply they could endanger anyone (although, I’m not seeing any reporting that they did, so I’m not sure where that’s coming from), just that they have legitimate security concerns, and keeping where they’re staying secret is a legitimate reason to try to get away from people who would love to…

Wow, coming in hot there buddy. Avoiding people finding out where they were staying, is a legitimate safety concern for them and - since it was someone’s private residence - whoever normally lives there. That’s a different concern than “avoiding getting their photos taken” per the OP. I guess I should have anticipated…

I think they were trying to avoid having the photographers find out where they were staying, which was apparently not a hotel. That seems entirely legitimate to me.

I wasn’t giving you shit. You started talking to me, moron.

Yeah, he’s one of those folks that thinks that monomania is expertise, and stamina is an adequate replacement for a coherent argument. Ultimately  his goal here is to defend the incel wordlview without the typical incel vulgarity. He sneaks under people’s radar as a result.

I wasn’t talking to you, moron. That said: Her opinion is that you are an incel that should fuck off. My opinion is that she is right, and also that you are a moron (though, that’s less an opinion than an observation). As you are a moron, you not taking me seriously means nothing to me. Since you are a moron, it was…

This moron is not worth responding to, but if you have to respond to him, this is always the correct response.

It’s obvious nonsense, true, but at the same time “aliens built the Pyramids” is taking credit away from the people who did build the Pyramids and seems to be rooted in “these primitive people could not have built done something so impressive.” That’s straight up insulting in a way that suggesting Cleopatra might…

Agreed on the friend and the locker room scene: my group was all cackling for that.

Alternate headline: Credulous Jezebel writer falls for obvious publicity gambit.

I saw it this weekend, and also loved it. Every role was perfectly cast, but especially Kansara: she had to walk a very fine line for anything to work, and she absolutely nailed it.

Well, the British monarchy is at least powerless. The number of people who are elected and then never in danger of losing their seats, a president voted in by “Electors” with only passing connection to the will of the voters, nepotistic and celebrated political “dynasties”, a Supreme court where all of the justices…

I think what really makes Rich such an aggravating reviewer is that his preoccupation is to convey where a particular cultural product fits into his worldview. You’re never going to be surprised by a Juzwiak take: He’s always going to sneer at the middlebrow and mainstream, and he’s always going to rave about the…

Not a lawyer, but I think it means that they are not calling witnesses of their own.

Nobody who’s ever worked for Jezebel is in any danger of being notable enough to arrest.

I’d say it’s that you have a healthy confidence and base your choices on what you want, while the author seems to be more concerned about what she imagines other people might think about her choices. I don’t think insecurity is a particularly New York affliction though.

“ideally the my wedding dress retailer can speak to some of that conflict.”

Correction: “a disabled 12-year-old incest rape victim *that works in a meat packing plant* being denied an abortion.”

The writers here have no sense of object permanence, or the ability to read past the fifth Google search result.