Banned for two years and no longer used in e-cigs.

The Lancet and the British medical establishment disagrees with you.

Frankly I’ve seen very little vaping research published in peer reviewed journals that was by anyone with any sort of funding or conflict of interest from tobacco (or vaping) related companies, probably at least in part because most respected journals wouldn’t accept that. And any research with those sorts of…

> Also, nicotine is meant for me, when I inhale, it gets to my bloodstream, that’s why there is no trace of it in second hand vapour.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177718

“We observed no apparent difference in the weekly mean particle distribution between 43 homes reporting any electronic cigarette usage and those reporting none”.

I would like to see the sources you used besides the surgeon general’s site.

The problem is that most of you, paid researchers, funded by tobacco companies doesn’t use the same vapour we inhale. When we inhale, the air circulates inside the device, rapidly cooling the coil, stoppong it from overheating. These devices also has a theal control mode which let’s you set what maximum temperarure…

Zero studies linked in the report (the survey was hardly a study, it asked opinions and offered no scientific evidence one way or the other), zero studies linked on the primary page the info came from. I’m gonna call bullshit on this. There’s plenty of evidence out of the EU, a place that’s shown it actually cares…

Second hand vape is bad for you? Please! The smoking Nazis will never stop with their propaganda. I’d much rather have someone vape around me than smoke real cigarettes. This is from a non-smoker/vapor, I just hate to see science being used as a weapon against the stupid. There are more harmful chemicals and ultrafine…

I’ll give it one thing, working in a heavy-secondhand smoke environment, I’ll take vapor over smoke any day, it doesn’t aggravate my lungs or allergies the same way.