Nooooooo. That's not David Tennant! There's no TARDIS!

Yeah well this is a tech blog. The only thing that is "tech" in this article is the fact that he posted on Twitter. Stuff like this is not in the spirit of Gizmodo imho

Thank you!! I was considering doing this myself, but now I don't have to. I just can't seem to rationalize the whole situation

If you have a Mac download Automatic. Your welcome.

That's exactly what I thought. Also the whole "River is the baby" theory just sounds preposterous... But with Moffet you never know I guess.

Most logical reply I've heard on Giz in a while.

I call Photoshopz

Actually really changing my considerations... I was gonna go Xoom, but maybe not anymore

O God... This looks really, really nice, but for some reason I feel that I still want the iPad. I guess I'm really pinning on iOS 5 being something damn good because the Xoom looks like a really good choice but I can't seem to sell myself. Maybe I'll just have to actually use it...

This is perhaps the greatest comment I have ever read on Gizmodo. Where is your star?

The saddest part: no Steve :(

I love having to go to the source to actually read articles. Giz, this isn't journalism, it's tweeting reposts. Fix this.

Linux theme

@Arcane: These days anything is HD...

@LCL: ^^ya

@wardy89: <3

@VorlonKosh: O except for the fact that it parses human language and can actually learn...

The only thing I can see pointing to anti-trust would be them regulating how to sell the company's product at a competitive price. But, Apple gives them the option to not sell it at all. And they still COULD go through Cydia if they really wanted to. The whole iOS ecosystem could technically be anti-trust, but I don't…

@AJ: Technically they can if you agree to it as a developer. I mean as far as I know it is not illegal to do as long as the SAME product is being distributed in the other store. I mean, they do agree to it by developing. I can see loopholes forming all around this though.