Are we still doing this stupid thing where we conflate memorializing something in a celebratory manner and outright banning it from existence? No one is saying this photo should disappear from history, just like no one is saying all historical references to Confederate leaders should be stricken from the historical…

Sorry but got a good laugh out of Musk calling anyone else “extremely dumb”.

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/02/01/1152893248/red-cobalt-congo-drc-mining-siddharth-kara

First up: the offensiveness of this photo is not what is at issue, it’s the message it sends: This behavior is OK. Taking down the photo sends the opposite message: This behavior is not OK. For the record, do you think non-consensual kissing and other contact is OK?

Not really to the second thing. If one is already going to go eco-terrorist, there’s nothing wrong with attacking Musk. His companies are hardly some Green Benevolence to us all.

It should be banned, Friedman was clearly being assaulted in the photo, regardless of its “celebratory” nature. 

Well, now you look like a childish dbag for not thinking for yourself, and trying to "be hard" in a comment section. That's "what now".

Elon really really wanted to sue the bejeezus out of that kid too, but he quickly found out from his massive stable of lawyers that it would be immediately thrown out, because as the article states, he’s only posting information that is already publicly available. He is literally doing nothing wrong. Now if you want…

“Enjoy” means that I understood them, not just that I was entertained by them.

Considering most people never make it past the title and the title is

Article Title: “I saw a tiktok and I need to meet my article quota.”

Article Title: 23 Years Later, We’ve Discovered An Amazing GameCube Easter Egg

You see how this title is structed, right? Creates assumption that something BRAND NEW has been found, right? You mock yourself, but yet you also knew many people would click based on that title and waste their time.

You had to have known…

Did... did this “article” time travel from 2002?

23 Years Later, We’ve Discovered An Amazing GameCube Easter Egg

Indeed, shame on them for giving a genocidal fascist money instead of allowing their creative works to stand on their own merits. Sadly it worked out for them financially, which will only encourage such behavior in the future.

No, transphobia is childish nonsense. Anybody spreading it is a piece of shit. Anybody defending transphobes is also a piece of shit.

She has called for the eradication of a group of people. She is below shit, as is anyone who defends her.

Imagine if you devoted 1/10th of the energy you expended defending a billionaire on anything else. Like, for example, the people she brazenly wishes to disenfranchise.

This is very thoughtful and moving.

Can someone please edit this article? The implication is that she says this in response to Star Wars, recently, but it’s actually from 2015, and is about her making documentaries about the abuse and mistreatment of women in Pakistan, and how by having uncomfortable conversations, she is helping people actually see and…