I just looked up “built in sous vide,” which was not even a thing I knew existed before today. I thought the whole purpose was that you just attach it to whatever pot you need to fit the thing you want to cook. A built in compartment for sous vide just seems like a giant unitasker. It’s a waste of space, AND it can…

Totally agree on a hood that vents outside, especially if you’re cooking with gas. I had our vent pushed through the wall this spring after reading about how much noxious exhaust a gas range produces.

But that’s why you buy a pasta pot with a perforated basket insert. Then you’re only lifting the pasta.  Edit: But now I realize that doesn’t solve the original pot weight issue...

Agreed on the hood big time. 600 CFM minimum or you are wasting your $$$.

Built in sous vide is dumb. Very few people will sue it often enough to justify the waste of space.

They also are called “Pasta arms”, same deal. If you can’t lift a pot of water to the stove you wouldn’t be able to lift it off so no real point.

A fireplace, a couch and two overstuffed armchairs and a higher but not table height coffee type table as the eat-in area. A clawfoot tub. A conservatory overlooking a traditional English kitchen garden. Fuck it - add a bed and a WC and I don’t need the rest of the house.

Will you two get a room already?

Astroturfing AVClub with burner accounts, one which he just tried replying to me with, doesn’t seem all that fun to me. But what do I know?

What’s really bad and weird about him is that he appears to be doing it from two different accounts. He was on here last week with a different avi, but same name and different arguments.

ThThat was the point of those two storylines, exactly. The Jack storyline reminded me a little of an inverted take on the “manic pixie dream girl” dismantling in “Arrested Development”, where the “quirky “ character played by Charlize Theron turned out to actually have a mental disability.

My thought: Is learning how to shoot a mandatory Rich People Thing? Like Amber Gemstone? 

It’s a very “Sun expected to rise tomorrow” headline

I mean, even if you were offering up your body, you’d be renting it out, not selling it, since you still have it afterwards.

Forgot about that picture of Greg in the cowboy hat. Once Tanya finds that old VHS tape Greg made of himself trying to throw a football over a mountain, things are really going to hit the fan.

1. If you take your own advice and google “infidelity clause,” you’ll see that they are difficult to enforce, and in some states, unenforceable.

I’m not agitated or steaming mad or anythin. I don’t like it when people start a discussion about a theory they have and then hand wave away any criticisms of it with comments like, it’s just a TV show and you have to accept they wouldn’t care about minute details like that. Discussing pedantic details is the fun of…

I was replying to a comment you made originally where you insulted the person who replied to you and advised them to Google infidelity clauses. Now you are telling me to not overthink it and just accept shoddy writing not based in reality? OK...

Didn’t Momma Di Grasso say that the American cousins were only after her money, which, what?!

The one other hint from the first episode that Greg is plotting something is that he got to Sicily before Tanya, and wasn’t responding to her texts. And his outrage about Portia being there could be read as her disrupting his plot.