ginaromarienne-old
ginaromarienne
ginaromarienne-old

Especially when the DA's office is awash with anonymous sources, and people are so eager to accept what they say.

Oh, look, it's the same paper that eagerly blamed the eleven-year-old gang rape victim.

Looks like those rape cops had had some suspicious dealings with at least one other woman before. Wonder how many didn't report?

How many women tell the truth and get called liars?

Did she actually lie? Or did those anonymous sources that have been reporting shit to the press make shit up?

That isn't new, is it? The victim's name was Amidou Diallo, unless——Jesus—-there was another one.

The maid's been a shifty person? Or have those anonymous sources figured out what to say that hits all those nerves with the sexist general public? There's been no confirmation of anything,. just constant anonymous leaks from the DA's office.

I can't imagine why a rape victim wouldn't want to see their HIV status discussed, dealing with prosecution links, and being openly called a whore—-and all that after being sexually assaulted.

Is it a joke if it's the same old sexist crap used to browbeat women into intimidation? "It's just a joke, you feminazi. What's a matter, can't you take a joke?" Neither one of them is original or anything but a sexist blowhard. They both have more in common with Rush Limbaugh——he has the same view and voice about

His jokes about women aren't serious? Then why aren't they funny? His punchline about every woman seems to be, "What a bitch/etc., etc., etc.," and he flatly shuts down any type of conversation about sexism in the US or the Western world in general. He uses specifically sexist terms and concepts about women. That's

Ann Coulter's called Democratic women smelly obese hippie heifers (not her exact words) and said that women should not be able to vote (pretty much exact). And I think she used to date Bill Mahr. Plus she defended Clarence Thomas and said Timothy McVeigh should have blown up the New York Times building. Plus she's

How can you condemn fundamentalist Islamic religious law but simultaneously write a document that's pretty much identical? Let's face it, most fundamentalist religions have the same obsessions. And it's pretty primitive for somebody like Bachman not to see the similarities but she's pretty primitive herself.

"I'm also confused as to how Jones believes she was assaulted by....."

"Not deemed admissable" is not the same as 'didn't happen.'

I think that was a KBR claim—-in other words, not legit.

There's a revolting blog and book by a guy who claims he's a British cop and he flat out says that 99 of the 100 rape cases he sees aren't 'real'——the 'victim' was drunk. They brow beat them till they back out.

Er, no. Not according to the Mother Jones arrticle. Pectoral muscle or pectoral capsule, something ruptured.

Because it's inconvenient. Consent is not hard to grasp. If you're worried about it, you don't have it.

Well, you saw that list of drugs, right? I mean, we know what that means, amirite? What kills me is that it failed to point out that those drugs have many uses. They did not cite who prescribed them and for what or for how long or that at least a couple of those drugs are often combined. And you're right, the whole

KBR's words are less than worthless.