Not at all. It's only the no bullshit leap.

So, dudes think women are: either beautiful enough to be their sub-human ego strokers, or ugly enough to be their sub-sub-human masturbating hole. News? Not really.

"This is how women should think. This is how their sexuality should be."

Denouncing MRAs as the mysoginistic, rape-apologist, derailing douchebag scum they are, is not a "strawman", much less is it an attack on "men". Learn to fucking read, MRA.

Just so you know, you probably just now ruined that douche-bro's fantasy of eradicating all females, and replace them with compliant fem-bots.

And they only remember all these wronged men, when women are the victims. It's odd... It's as if, crazy notion here: they actually don't care two shits about the men; they only enjoy using them to lash out at them bitches.

What? The same raped male students that - when you're not too busy using their abused status to crap all over a dead raped girl - you would pat on the back with an "ata boy", and completely disregard and mock, while crying on why-oh-why weren't there teachers like those on your sorry time?

More like we live in a culture where a certain daft group insists that it is waaaaay to easy for women to accuse men of rape, and that the male gender is a collective of sexual martyrs of sorts.

The admitted ignorance concerning pretty basic porn terms coming from a sizeable number of jezzies in this article : the general loud support of porn from a sizeable number of jezzies on other articles.

They're nudists. Isn't being embarrassed by their own bodies, sort of defeating the purpose?

Precisely. In a nudist colony, where the emphasis is - supposedly - being freer from constraints and closer to nature, what exactly is the point of a cock ring?

"Who isn't getting shit on the internet, first of all?"

Hippies: just about as bad as Nazis, tbh.

Forget about it. Next time there is a mention to Neko Case, there will be this single isolated comment of "This racist homophobic bitch again, ugh!", and the bashing based on an out of context quote will continue.

No, actually, it's a repository of information that anyone can edit, that, due to it's nature, is prone to manipulation from a specific community set on social privilege , be it based on sex, ethnic origin or population number.

He's a privileged individual saying his privilege doesn't exist - this would be a funny issue in itself, even if there wasn't a largely problematic history surrounding the pack he admittedly belongs to, which there is. Your apologia is what happens when one takes things at face value with no accounting for context.

Because it's an individual that's part of a systemically privileged social group, saying the privilege doesn't exist, while, at the same time, he's part of a pack that's set on maintaining and re-enforcing said privilege, mostly by means of silencing and tormenting those who are underprivileged. It's quite funny.

"Psychologist Herb Goldberg, a prominent figure in the Men right's movement, has criticized the notion of male privilege, calling it a "myth"."