To be fair...that's why they wear their not-so-secret-decoder-button on their clothes. You can't blame that on a staffer. You blame this, if anything, on the fact that they spend so little time outside of their own circle of safety and then so much time out of DC fundraising in their districts, that they can't even…

Not so fast. Please don’t think lack of proximity protects. All rapes inherently involve two human beings very near each other and Wellesley is not hermetcially sealed off from reality. http://tech.mit.edu/V112/N12/rapes…

They do. If the crime requires a specific intent to commit the offense, a defense is voluntary intoxication left you in a state of mind capable of forming intent. Only defense he had. My guess is that the prosecutor and defense couldn’t work out a deal. I’m glad they didn’t work out a deal.

Principal theory of culpability. Participated in the crime as a principal just like the getaway driver and the lookout in a bank robbery are no different than the stick-up man.

Remember when all the middle school girls used to sit around at recess and think of dreamy names for their future kids? Apparently they had them.

The fact that he is a FORMER soldier and doesn’t see the difference at least gives me some assurances.

Which post-doping world are we currently in? For those who’ve followed cycling for more than a minute, we’ve heard that phrase before.

Worth noting why Mr. Kratz is now in private practice: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa…. Reasonable doubt is for innocent people. Indeed.