Yeah buddy! Which stats? Jeter has higher batting average, more hits and about 300 more stolen bases. Ripken has more HR's and RBI's. Yeah you sure are winning on the internet. Wow. So now that it is clear the statistics are mixed, from which standpoint do you 'win'? No stats negate what Cal did that day either.
giantveggies
giantveggies
Yes I'm serious because I don't think we were talking about their whole careers or full skills as a player. The poster made a joke that Ripken > Jeter because Ripken was so clutch he could hit a HR in his last all star game, while Jeter only hit a double. While that's nice and all the reality is the only clutch play…
I actually think Giambi was safe on that play. My point was that Derek Jeter performed when it counted, in the playoffs, helping his team win 5 world championships. In contrast the only big game play Ripken is known for is purposely delaying the game to win the state championship.
I was trying to compare Ripkens performance in big games vs that of Jeters. Unfortunately Ripken was never in many big games because he sucked [no he didn't just want to bother you] and I had to go all the way back to high school to find anything remarkable about his performance in such games. Isn't it odd that the…
I lose it around the part where you start talking. Everyone plays down the individual acheivements right? It's all about the W is what they say? Under that light Cal isn't even in contention sorry, put a bunch of monkeys on typewriters they eventually will write Hamlet. The chances 1 of the 30 teams will win the world…
Now playing
It's ok. Jeter is a 5 time world champion and was once the world series MVP. Big Giant Congrats to Ripken for hitting the HR when it counts. Ripken only got where he was from nepotism. LMFAO.
That must be soooo smooth. As a skater I'm jealous.
So the loss of one fight, which was not going to be the main, or co-main event totally ruins a card? I know you have it labelled like it was going to be a co-main, but what you drew on your little stick figure slide doesn't make it reality.
Ever heard of talking?
If you buy a game for $69, full price. The developer does not get $69. If you do a direct sale? Sure! But that is just a sliver of the market. Lots {not all} of sales do not impact developers. There are many agreements between the publishers and retailers determining their behavior, I won't pretend to know the…
Free is free. Hard to argue with that. That being said, Origin's on the house offering does nothing to tarnish the offerings of Games with Gold and PS+. That those come along as bundled freebies with a paid subscription to something else is apples and oranges. If you are going to compare like that then go ahead and…
Lots of sales never impact developers. Many times sales are simply taking a cut of the 3x markup that is standard in all retail.
Now playing
"That's like a white boy tring to be more nigger than me.... Nigger, tell me how my ass tastes." - SHAQ
The laws of thermodynamics apply, if you think you get double production with less than double the work your a fucking idiot.
Stop blaming fucking developers, blame the fucking business analysts, fucking project managers and fucking management.
No, it didn't show off everything east of Texas well enough.
Ummmm... No it didn't. Maryland wasn't a confederate state, and there was never such a thing as the District of Dixie. And while we are at it, there was no such thing as Oklahoma until 40 years after the war.
Map is wrong, Confederate Arizona wasn't a state. And the shape is wrong.
not all white people