giantrobo1985
GiantRobo1985
giantrobo1985

Hi, I work in Washington, but I appreciate the insiders view, thanks. Here’s an insider tip for you: the rules that govern the Army and the NNSA are different, and there can’t be an acting director because by statue only appointees can give direction to the agency. That would also apply to the Secretary of Energy.

libtard

search your feelings, you know it to be you

Thanks, comrade! There are plenty of others taking your bait and trying to #explaintheswamp to your tiny mind, but let me be yet another voice reminding you that this ‘swamp’ has afforded you:

Yeah, Obama was such a bad president. He only recovered the economy, unemployment, gave everyone health care and generally was seen as a good guy by both sides.

“No, I haven’t at all. But I have had some insight into the back room dealings of some of Obama’s other appointees. And they have some common traits and agendas.”

How’s that swamp draining going with all the elites and billionaires Trump has appointed so far? What do you think his success rate of appointment is going to be?

You are the swamp that America needs to drain. The drainage system is called education. Until that drain is unclogged, we pinch our noses at your wretched stinkiness.

Did you read the fucking article on why those people matter?

If by nothing bad then you mean no transfer of institutional knowledge, best practices, security question answers to “I forgot my nuclear bunker pass-code” recovery and general “how to do this job” then yes, “nothing bad is going to happen”

By that logic companies can save a shit ton of money if they just get rid of their CEOs. That’s even less of an employment percentage reduction.

How are positions maintaining the nuclear arsenal “the swamp”?

Hi, I’m tekkblade128 and I couldn’t be bothered to read the article that provided details about exactly what would (or more precisely, would not) happen. Nothing in the article even mentioned employment reduction in and of itself as being relevant but I can certainly use that as a reason to dismiss people’s concerns.

More like #icanonlycommunicateinbumperstickerslogans

But if there’s no swamp, where will all the Pepe the Frogs live?

THE HEADS OF THE DEPARTMENT.

It’s a department that, by law, can’t do ANYTHING without those 2 people.

Yes, who needs leadership? Good take.

How do you mean? Have you done any research on these individuals and have insight into their back room dealings or something?