ghaleonqq
GhaleonQ
ghaleonqq

ESA are ideally a state program. Arizona has 1 and Nevada had 1 that was ruled unconstitutional, and now Wisconsin and other states are trying to have it work.

And I'm in Wisconsin, where until recently, there was a program to do just that and everyone was cool with it.

I get that education savings accounts will have drawbacks and any sea change will have a destabilizing effect that may need to be mitigated by the state or federal governments.

The benefits of local control, certainly in the era when such systems were developed, are great. People largely stayed put, and they deserved the ability to shape their children's futures instead of some bureaucrat who's unqualified to determine education standards or funding. (Seriously, we have some doozies.)

That's some nonsense or at very least geographically and historically specific. I'm from small town, rural-adjacent, central Wisconsin (so, central and northern European Catholics and Lutherans, mostly blue collar conservative, basically the equivalent of middle England). The Lutheran school was of extremely high

I was going to say that is was rather sane from what I see as the top comments, basically, "Suck it, liberals, this was instituted by you and perpetuated by you." Agree or disagree, it's what we accept as internet discourse.

Yeah, as much as I appreciate Oliver talking to liberals about the issue and know that the current school funding mechanism is a blunt instrument (everyone! education savings accounts are the fairest future for all! liberals and conservatives can work together!), he clearly is still a technocratic liberal.

"it’s not that…institutions will be quickly destroyed by the inability to control information, but rather that they will hemorrhage authority over time."

I don't know if you've seen the trailer for Sing, but people unexpectedly singing a song is what comedy in 2016 is. JOIN. JOIN AND LAFF.

Probably not, I think. The changing of relationship, sexual, marriage, and gender norms seems to have been on fast forward the last 75 years.

I truly adore the Chandling character, but typically the twist is more authentically self-loathing rather than a clear bit, so this one didn't work as well, even with Cannon's contrast.

I would not go that far at all, but she (and her show's writers) are so simplistic and zealous about there being right answers that require no compromise that it's hilarious to see them entangled in that situation.

I don't think I really liked a single bit on its own merits, but agreed! I'm excited about the outcomes of each storyline, which is half of free wrestling's job, anyway. I am certain Goldberg versus Lesnar will just be the WWE Big Match of Goldberg getting dropped on his shoulders a bunch until he SOMEHOW FINDS A WAY

He…He was funny on Kimmel's show? I would like to think he's less fragile than many internet darlings WHO MUST THEN BE SMASHED BECAUSE NOTHING CAN BE INNOCENT OR UNEXAMINED.

Even with a couple years out of the game, I have an exhaustive knowledge of video game music. You'd think I'd listen to it regularly, or at least after 100-percenting a particular title.

Yeaaaaah! At least we aren't like THEM, Thanks. ~_^

In this presidential election cycle, when so many good articles have been written about the rural or caucasian or red state underclass (either sympathetic or neutral), I am not impressed by people who follow lagging indicators.

He is quite good at the use of archetypes, and yet Trump himself is a horrible storyteller when it matters. While Trump's going to be around for at least the next 2 years sabotaging the party I tend to vote for, he could actually have won this thing if he had bothered to explain any of his conspiracy theories,

So did The Force Awakens' trailers. :/ You've failed me for the last time, franchise, or something.