Because its the same size, around the same price, quicker, and has a center of gravity so low it makes a squirrel’s nutsack look like Paul Bunyan’s touque
Because its the same size, around the same price, quicker, and has a center of gravity so low it makes a squirrel’s nutsack look like Paul Bunyan’s touque
Why is it hard to see? Their losses didn’t widen, it shrank. Are you reading the same financial statement?
This is rather ridiculous.
Kinda funny that Ford is mocking them when they started in a similar way. Constant changes to make cars easier to assemble and a focus on vertical integration. I don’t get all the negativity on Tesla or why anyone would cheer for the most American car company in existence to fail. They are a very young company that…
I give them gargantuan credit. Has there been a single mass production, 100% upstart car manufacturer.... well, since... heck, the fifties?
“I said I wanted concours paint, not contours!”
All you are seeing is reinvestment. For a company to grow they need to spend. More factories, more workers, more engineers, etc. If you wait until one segment is profitable before you spend it, you end up slowing your growth down.
How can you wait for something to happen then say you’ll be the first to do it? It’s like a Trumpism. “If people start building electric supercars, then I’ll build an electric supercar and be the first to do it. It’s gonna be electric. Very electric, the most electric. Electric like you’ve never seen.”
I want a brand-new Ford Ranger for Christmas
Only a 4x4 model will do
No Colorados, no Land Cruisers
I only like Ford Ranger bruisers
And 4x4 Ford Rangers like me too!
Of course it was a white, round looking front-end that it attacked...