Because this is about to be flooded with Penn State fans, I’ll take the burden of the worst comment off their shoulders so they can feel more free to be full on idiots without fear of being the worst person here, like they are most places:

Because no one needs any of this. I have it all just like everyone else but you and OP both have this emotion about it and then you just said basically “think of the children!” If some kid didn’t get an Xbox for Christmas absolutely nothing happens to them. If they’re a shit kid they get upset, but it passes, and…

1. You’re

You are correct. That’s the business that Gawker was in. That’s the business that Univision is in. But Univision is not in the business of defending lawsuits brought against Gawker. Much like Gawker employees you’re hyper-focused on this concept of journalistic integrity, etc. This has zero to do with that concept…

The problem is YOU are making that determination. In reality I agree with you but you’re still missing the legal nuance. They’re being sued for questioning that truth. The truth is for courts to decide. And until that decision is made Univision can’t risk that a court doesn’t agree with you or me

You’re still missing the point completely. This is purely due to contract/acquisition law. If Gawker Media as a company were continuing on these would not be deleted. If these had been published under Univision’s ownership they would not be deleted. It’s the transferring of Gawker to Univision that creates an undue…

I was using defamatory colloquially. No one at Univision or Gawker believes these suits have merit. But Univision is not in the business of risking money as a result of belief.

You are correct. If Univision runs defamatory articles, true or not, they will likely be sued, and may lose some of those lawsuits.

Who says they’re true? And, Hulk Hogan post was true and he just got $140 million. You can’t be that obtuse

That’s not how any of this works. Would you take on someone else’s potential liability for lawsuits already in process because they said “meh, it’s fine”. They literally just lost $140 million in a similar situation

You’re just making up that this is how anything begins. You’re assuming the worst based on nothing

You could not possibly be more wrong and I don’t know how you refuse to understand this. Their choice was solely due to standard acquisition legal practice. Univision has no reason to want to be responsible for existing lawsuits against Gawker. A similar lawsuit literally bankrupted the company and is why Univision…

Please tell me you can’t legally vote

This is a complete misunderstanding of the issue. She’s not a woman with a known clean bill of health. She’s a woman with serious past medical problems.

What teeth are those? The ones that sank into Hulk Hogan and lost the entire company?

Explain why you think this is censorship

If anyone at Gawker really cared they’d offer specific indemnity to Univision regarding any future liabilities from these lawsuits.

Maybe they’ll include a dictionary with your new phone so you can look into theirs instead

Did you “blast” them in English or whatever language you wrote this in?

On top of all that, you have to live in Singapore