geraltcloud9
geraltcloud9
geraltcloud9

I’m pretty confused by this outcome as well. I remember reading the comments and it seemed like EVERYONE was saying end-grain (or whatever) was the best type of cutting board. I guess that the dozens of comments saying that meant that most only had one or two stars, vs. the ones listed here which probably got a few

I’m pretty confused by this outcome as well. I remember reading the comments and it seemed like EVERYONE was saying

Heeeeyyyy...did you go to hollywood upstairs medical college too?

And make sure to eat plenty of foods from the Chocotastic Group!

“Kershaw, who’s looked shockingly (for him) and familiarly (for him in October) human and especially susceptible to the long ball”

Hey! How dare you attack Golden Retrievers by comparing them to Brady. Goldens are consistently ranked as one of the most intelligent dog breeds. This is just pure defamation!

*

Let’s not go overboard. My folks have had a Model S for years, and after driving it for tens of thousands of miles they love it so much that they’re buying another one by the end of the year, and my sister just bought a Model X. I’m sorry that this guy had a bad experience, but my family has had the exact opposite

Completely agree actually. I read an article a few months back talking about how this season every at bat basically has two outcomes- a strikeout or a home run. The shift in the types of hits we see has been incredibly dramatic- partially due to the balls, but also because all the advanced metrics have resulted in

“there is no reason a Sunday World Series game should be ending on a Monday.”

A) I don’t think the rule is designed to prevent the batter from interfering with the catcher’s ability to prevent the passed ball. It seems more logical that it is to ensure the catcher isn’t impeded in chasing after it. Reacting to being smacked in the face/head by a baseball bat slows down the catcher, making it

“I don’t get why you’d reward bad behavior”

You seem nice.

You must be someone who doesn’t know what the word “enough” means.

And I roll my eyes and chuckle before responding. Thanks for the commenting tips :)

This entire post is an absurd sarcastic rant- that’s literally the whole point of the article. I wasn’t calling your post the only absurd rant, which is why I separated it out into another paragraph. If you don’t think rants can be sarcastic then allow me to introduce you to the internet. And I didn’t take your words

“This column was a good start, I just hope he doesn’t stop.”

Was the topless Mario picture actually after the spoiler for everyone else? I couldn’t care less, but just wanted to point it out in case the author wanted to change the formatting to line up with what he wrote.

*

I’m not sure what about my response indicated I didn’t get that your comment was sarcasm...