geraltcloud9
geraltcloud9
geraltcloud9

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha. Oh man. I didn’t even think I was being subtle. This is amazing. Cheers pal- I’ll remember you fondly :)

Hold up hold up hold up...do you really not understand what’s going on here?

You can’t be this stupid...

Oh, I completely agree with you. I don’t think anyone should expect the Packers to light things up through the air for the rest of the year. I was just pointing out that most people actually thought Rodgers was going to be pretty good- they may not have realized just HOW good he was, but it was pretty reasonable to

No capitalization and terrible punctuation? A return to form for you!!

Hahahaha, gotcha. So you posted an irrelevant comment that was meant as a snarky rejection of the premise of my comment, had no intention of engaging in an actual discussion, and then falsely criticized me for posting irrelevant comments with no intention of engaging in actual discussion. Cheers to you sir- you made

Eh, most people had a good expectation that Rodgers would be pretty solid (that expectation was the whole reason they insisted on Favre going in the first place). A better example is when Drew Bledsoe went down and the Patriots had to start some 6th round pick named Brady. I still remember the guys on PTI and Around

I’ll never get the criticism against Reid. Everywhere he goes teams outperform, do well, and win. Sure, he hasn’t won a super bowl, but it’s not like those Eagles teams were exactly world beaters. Is he an all time great head coach of the likes of Lombardi or Belichick? No. But he’s a pretty good coach, and he’d be an

Now playing

Norm MacDonald nailed the “battle” terminology -

People need to chill out about In-N-Out. The problem is the hype makes it sound like it’s an objectively excellent burger no matter the metric. It is most certainly not. If you compare it based off of cost, then sure, it’s much better than McDonalds (kinda like how George W all of the sudden looks like a fantastic

It’s almost as if attempts to shout down the #MeToo are more about distracting from efforts to raise awareness about sexual assault and telling women to be quiet than it is about really addressing an underlying problem in this country (for the record- I’m a dude. I just think the whole “men are victims of sexual

“As for your B), it’s not a question of “what about the men”, it’s a question of “what about ALL victims of sexual assault”? That you don’t believe victims of sexual assault should be considered one unified group but STILL want to divide it into pointless gender-war battlelines might be more telling than you want it

I didn’t say it wasn’t intended to raise awareness of sexual assault experienced by women. I said that it wasn’t intended to say that sexual assault only occurs to women. The claim was that it ignores sexual assault experienced by men and I was responding to that claim by pointing out what the original blurb did NOT

Wut? So wut? Saying “x is a problem” doesn’t mean “y is not a problem and we should ignore it and never do anything about it.” If I say “Puerto Rico is really struggling right now” I’m not “ignoring” or dismissing the problems facing the middle east, the middle class, or middle earth. How selfish can you be to hear

Lol, give me a break. I’m not sure how me posting a comment and then engaging in discussions with people about it is supposed to be a sign that I am shouting at someone and running away, but okay. If you actually wanted to engage with the subject then maybe don’t post an irrelevant comment that had nothing to do with

Wait, were you under the impression that people can’t disagree with other people’s suggestions?