With regards to point 1, that was exactly my thought. What the hell is the hound doing hurling rocks? Hell, once the wights charge he pounds the ice to sink one of the one’s attacking him. Why the hell didn’t the team just walk around pounding ice until Dany showed up? Of course, consistency wasn’t a big focus point…

It also makes no sense that Littlefinger has been turned into a pure villain for the Stark sisters to get rid of. He’s been amoral at best the whole series- if it wasn’t for him Jon would be dead and Sansa would be either dead or back in Ramsay’s clutches. He manipulates things to his own advantage, but he’s no worse…

“However, my point is that the amount of people complaining about logic going out the window has, for whatever reason, increased manyfold this season. And I’m wondering why this season.”

People just seem to take on faith that the REAL danger is the white walkers. I know I know, the show has beat us over the head with that via forced exposition. But so far they’ve spent seven seasons stumbling around beyond the wall. Sure, we saw them take over one tiny town north of the wall. But last night an entire…

Dude, this show is WAAAAYYY past any objections that something can’t happen because it would be stupid.

I’m calling it now- it breathes blue fire. Blowing snow or ice would just look stupid.

“Calling it now - this is all a performance for Littlefinger and there’s gonna be a big reveal next week.”

I thought the same thing. I never get the urge to purposefully overplay a rhetorical hand. What happened was terrible enough- misleading language only allows those who disagree with you to have an easy target to attack your bias.

I watched 2 minutes of it and it made me physically uncomfortable. How do people watch an entire episode?

If the people that criticized him did so SOLELY on the basis that ANYONE on a sports team that is invited to the White House 100% must go then sure, that would somewhat inconsistent. But I’d imagine the opposition was more nuanced to that in many cases. Not to mention that the people making such arguments should…

I didn’t see her saying “don’t do anything about Nazis.” She was saying don’t give them a target and an audience that they can use for propaganda purposes. She said take affirmative steps to undercut their message. You can disagree with her (I happen to), but it’s not “privileged” or absurd to say that the counter…

“I think I should erase my original post. Apparently we live in a world where admitting your tired and would LIKE to be left alone is a very bad thing. Who knew?”

No, I get that. And you can argue that it wasn’t relevant to the question. I would disagree- I don’t agree with Lynch’s point, but his statement is at least related to the subject. He disagrees with the method of protest because it undermines the values that he thinks football promotes, and he then went on to discuss…

“The article to which you’re responding suggested that ABC likely would have WON if not in South Dakota then almost certainly on appeal.”

Dumber than writing “Laughing out out out out out out out out out out out out loud”?

But that’s not what he was talking about at that point. He was talking about football as a unifying force, and then provided an example of what he was talking about. And you didn’t say that his entire comment was a non sequitur to the issue of race relations in America- you said that the quote you provided was even…

How is that a non sequitur? Basically, he said “football is unifying thing. It brings people from a diverse array of backgrounds together. Warren Sapp is very different from me and comes from a very different background. Absent football, I would never have met him, but because of football we have been friends for…

Dude, I was once like you. I believed that my comments simply pointing out the poor logic of deadspinners’ comments would be read fairly and accurately. I used to argue with people that they were engaging in all sorts of ludicrously over the top logical flaws when they responded to my comments. And then I realized it…

I 100% support the players for sitting. I wish more would do it. But saying that this hasn’t been a divisive issue is, to paraphrase the author, nonsensical at best and idiotic at worst. I’ve seen plenty of veterans say they’re personally offended by it- your claim that they’re offended because of football is utterly…

edit...