geraltcloud9
geraltcloud9
geraltcloud9

And let’s think about what he’s actually asking the staff to do- when you ask for salsa they will dish it into your bowl. He is asking them to dish it into a container and apply a lid instead. He’s not asking them to do his taxes. It’s literally a grand total of 2 seconds of extra work for the staff, tops. The fact

Virtually none of these strike me as much extra work, and certainly not enough extra to work to warrant complaining about. Most of them fall broadly within the job description itself, so the only reason to get upset is if the customer is actually rude. It’s always fair to get upset at someone who is rude to you, but

These stories always just make me chuckle. As someone who has worked multiple service industry jobs in my lifetime, most of these complaints seem utterly ridiculous to me. Most of the one’s listed don’t even sound like line employees complaints rather than managers complaints. Breaking big bills? If I was working the

No, not even a little bit. Where did you get that notion from? You claimed the scientists are not at all guided by evidence and then immediately provided an example of the scientists changing their views based on new evidence.

“Either way, the only common denominator is luck and a good organization to facilitate that luck.”

“The echo does nothing my phone doesn’t already do.”

“The echo does nothing my phone doesn’t already do.”

“Otherwise it’s psuedo-science... like global warming. Which, coincidentally, isn’t called “global warming” anymore. Because the actual science didn’t back it up.”

Dude, you’re like a walking logical fallacy textbook.

Did your girlfriend buy that excuse ;)?

Did your girlfriend buy that excuse ;)?

He looks like the NBA’s most terrifying security guard.

This should totally be a thing. I vote for the OKC ‘Der, the NO Cans, the Philly Ers, etc. They’re all great.

But the fact the Boston has “lots of quality shots on draft night” doesn’t reinforce the notion that teams should try to win by tanking. Quite the opposite. Boston was the #1 seed in the East last year- nobody is looking at them and saying “the only way to get to that level is to be really bad for a few years.”

Wait a second- aren’t Curry, Klay, and Draymond all draft picks that were developed by GSW? If teams are actually paying attention to any of this (which your comment assumes they are) then why would ONE signing completely undercut the lesson being taught by the GSW on how to construct one of the greatest teams in the

That was as upsetting as the time Stuart Scott called Coach K “Coach K-Sizzle” while doing sideline reporting of a Duke game.

It’s been amazing to read this thread and see how many people attack you for making the claim that 100% of GSW’s success was due to luck. This is Kinja strawmanning at it’s finest. Don’t worry, most of us who are reading your comments can actually comprehend the point you’re making.

“then Cleveland got “lucky” that they were able to draft a once in a generation talent that just HAPPENED TO BE FROM CLEVELAND and wants to play for Cleveland.”

“If attributing success to luck isn’t a slight, then what the hell is it? It sure as hell aint praise.”

Good lord man, calm down. I specifically led my first reply to you by saying I largely agree with you. And my response was directly applicable to exactly the example you gave. The fact of the matter is that it still requires human beings to be able to judge based on imperfect data- the camera angle frequently doesn’t

“People thought replay in every sport was going to be “100%”. Hows that been working out?”