Cutting out Bumbles from a white background was a bitch

@obeliskoflight: Actually it is kind of glitchy, but you are right on the other points. I wouldn't say the review is bias so much as full of scathing cynicism.

indeed

@TheBlueRoad: "the Indiana law regarding a person's publicity rights, or his estate's, was enacted after Dillinger died."

indeed :Q...

@Bazinga!: Well both are terrible. The difference being that MS's blunder didn't expose credit card data.

@Titch007uk: Except Margartaville predates Farmville by 32 years, and Zynga by 30 years.

@Justapspfan: Of course!

@Dennen: I'm not following you here, the US is located on the west side of the Atlantic ocean.

That's a terrible example. Kotaku didn't publish the spoilers on the front page, they provided a link from there to the spoilers as not to spoil the story for anyone who had enough sense not to go looking. And guess what? They told you there are spoilers before you clicked.

Again, it you don't want it to be spoiled, you avoid places where they may pop up. It is easy to ignore, I do it all the time. If you can't resist looking, who's fault is that?

Of course I can read. However explicitly telling people not to point out your flawed logic isn't going to stop it from happening.

@XenoFi: well, if it was spoiled for you, its your own fault. The summary text on the main page specifically tells you there are going to be spoilers. The first paragraph when you click the article tells you there are spoilers.

Its not the only option. I can name 10 similar, albeit less known, VOIP services that do the same thing. As far as brand recognition goes, you're right, its not on the same level as Coke. But that wasn't the point of the comparison. If you ask anyone to do a voice chat, 99 times out of 100 the first suggestion is…

my pleasure

So basically Agent 47 is a bag of dicks?

I lol'd. Then I lol'd some more.

Valve purposefully sabotaged Portal 2 on 360? Link me to that if you would.

They will be doing both according to the official statement.