Because I watched the whole video and the bad stuff happens when there are no issues with the video. The issues in the video don’t start up until well after Bland and the officer have left the frame. If you’ve watched it all the way through, the only thing the glitches could be covering up is the tow truck driver…

It would be one thing if it were missing and looping in relevant places (like when he threatens her and draws a weapon on her) or if the audio cut out when he was in the middle of something relevant, but if this is some sort of cover-up, it couldn’t be more ham fisted. They didn’t hide the bad stuff, and they didn’t…

I don’t think you understand how any of that works.

Not to mention the public health aspect

If Lord Xenu sent a ray of cosmic radiation to earth, it would also disrupt the recording process. Just because you can format words in a particular order doesn’t mean a thing.

Yes, you think that there must be n-bombs aplenty because that’s what would confirm your beliefs. If you were capable of higher order analysis, you’d consider what was left in (already damning evidence of excessive force and escalation), what apparent edits/glitches occurred (visual, not audio), the context of those…

You’re trying way too hard to find something that just isn’t there. Says a lot about how you see the world

huh? what does Benghazi have to do with Bland?

Except it’s the video, not the audio that glitches. The audio keeps running smoothly when the cars are jumping around on the video.

In Tx, the officer just has to come up with some reason, any reason, that you need to step out, then you have to. To conduct a search of the car, for safety reasons, to give a sobriety test, etc. Doesn’t even need probable cause to tell you to step out, although they would need it for a search unless you give consent

The FBI is checking out both the dash cam and the motion activated camera footage for tampering

Right? It’s definitely weird that there are those loops and glitches, but they come at a pretty irrelevant point in the video and pale in comparison to threatening to ‘light her up’ with a taser.

So you think they edited the explosive footage of a tow truck idling in front of Bland’s car but left in the part where he threatens to ‘light her up’ while he points a taser in her face? That’s definitely what I would do if I were part of a massive conspiracy trying to cover this up.

... or it’s an honest technical issue and not a conspiracy perpetrated by a State level agency. Besides, the FBI is investigating the video of both the jail and the stop, so if there’s something sinister happening here, I don’t think they’ll have much trouble spotting it.

Maybe the mic has to be activated? I’ve got an in-law that’s a DPS trooper but I haven’t gotten to ask him about this case yet. Since it seems like the mic is on the cop, I wonder if the audio is stored to something on his person as well and then synced by time stamp to the video?

Suspicious? yes. But that doesn’t mean there’s any reason to think the missing seconds of footage shows any further ‘extent of the cop abusing this woman’ as you put it. How in the hell would they pull that off given that she’s already been gone for some time before the video issues begin?

Probably nothing involving Bland since she was already hauled off by the time the weird stuff in the video starts happening

I don’t know, it looks like the audio is in and out for most of the video and it seems to be coming from a mic he’s wearing. Maybe part of his radio? But definitely not a part of the camera in the car since we can hear him when he’s talking to Bland.

Bland is already long gone by the time the edits/glitches start to happen.

He’s on the campus of Prairie View A&M which is a HBC, so a high percentage of the drivers are going to be black women