gedavismarc
gedavismarc
gedavismarc

Tell that to all the black people who are in jail for that very thing.

Snort laughter!

comparing men’s tuxedo/suits is always a fun game of “spot the differences”.

So who do you think will? A four times bankrupt failed businessman whom Fortune magazine said was worth basically what he inherited, about $300MM, and a businessman so pathetic that a decent mutual fund could have yielded more? Or a religious head case who would like nothing more than an end of days, with him at the

The good old days

“She wanted to say something nice about a dead person”

Satan vs. Santa? Give me a fucking break. The only person calling Clinton “satan” is you, over and over again sarcastically, in response to any criticism of her, no matter how concrete or valid. Can we not have adult conversations about the candidates?

I’ve been supporting Clinton since the start of the campaign season (though would be happy to vote Sanders should he get the nom). I also have a career in public health. This incident really caused me to have some serious doubts on who I was casting my vote for. The Reagan’s handling of HIV/AIDS is likely the biggest

Personally, I’d be pretty fucking charmed by a presidential candidate who cut through the bullshit like that, but obviously it’d never be a clinton.

Just gave this some thought!

Not shitting on the Reagans DOES NOT EQUAL making up shit to laud them for.

There’s no explanation for how those words managed to come out of her mouth. She either knew they were wrong when she said them or she has some sort of mental issue that led to the mistake.

Ryan White was a charming young straight boy who acquired the disease as the result of a transfusion — not one of those dirty, dirty gays who were struck down by their own nasty behavior. Reagan embraced the Ryan Whites, sure, but turned his back on the affected gay community.

It’s not like anybody called out Michael Jackson as a child molester at his funeral...

It was odd that in a statement purportedly honoring the “brave lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people” who fought for HIV/AIDS research and treatment in the early days, the only one she managed to mention by name was a heterosexual career Congressman.

It was a good apology until she started talking about how many things she’s supported. That’s the pandering “look I fucked up here, but here’s where I made up for it, my poor memory isn’t THAT bad guyz!"

As others have said, she just didn’t need to bring up AIDS at all. It was shockingly tone deaf/ignorant and really weird. Just worrisome.

Well, yes, but I also doubt anyone went to his funeral and praised him for all the good work he did in his life to stop child molesters.

Yeah, it’s mind-boggling to think about, but this sort of “unforced error” is incredibly characteristic of her (and her husband, for that matter). Remember the email thing? Breaking the rules with her own private email server to avoid some ginned up “scandal” about their contents, and thereby creating an actual

Exactly. I didn’t see “I’m sorry,” or “I apologize” anywhere in her statement (and it would have been nice to see her squeeze at least one of those in before she started on all of the self praise).

While it was an admission of a mistake, there was no actual apology.