It was nice of Corbyn after spending the great bulk of his career being at best Brexit curious and at worst pro-Brexit to flip and move against Brexit in the final moments

Please note this explicit evidence that he/she did not read the article, which contains far more than that and which explicitly supports my point about Corbyn and his pro-Brexit bullshit.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/09/liberal-democrats-poised-to-back-revoking-article-50-brexit

Also, I don’t think anyone who thinks Corbyn is anti-Brexit has any damn business claiming I don’t know what I’m talking about. Labour has pissed away so many chances to take the anti-Brexit position under him. 

You know the Lib Dems have changed leadership since then, right? The previous leader was far more Brexit friendly than the current leader. I’m responding to recent news.

Brexit is a giant mess, a group of far-right hardliners getting called on their lies when basically no one expected that to happen. There’s a fair bit of evidence many of the people who voted for it in the initial referendum have changed their minds as the chaotic mess has been ongoing for awhile. If Labour wasn’t too…

I complain a lot about not being converted to FT after working at my current company for the last four years as a contractor. Then I read stories like these and realize I’m probably better off not having to deal with all the politics and people’s egos. I was in that world at my last job and only lasted two years…

“Russia, a country run by ultranationalist, right-wing oligarchs, have given a very expensive and valuable nuclear weapon to a bereft socialist country that’s been teetering on the brink of collapse for several years and has just enough military and police apparatus to hold itself together. Not even a Cuban Missile…

Oh, I’m not complaining about it being ungreyed, it was the expectation that he’d learn something I was commenting on....

I guess you also think Jesus is bullshit, too.

>> “Applicants must demonstrate they are admissible into the U.S. by overcoming all grounds of inadmissibility including health-related grounds, criminality, security reasons, public charge, labor certification, illegal entrants and immigration violations, documentation requirements, and miscellaneous grounds.”

Around 2,500 Hazara civilians have been killed by Pashtun Sunnis in both countries since 2001. I imagine people haven’t forgotten 1893, 1993, or 1998 either. Under the circumstances, I would forgive them any lack of faith in Kabul, while noting that that farce of a parliament is 25% Hazara seated now. 

“The First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise‐open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees,”

No.

Yeah, the Knight First Amendment Institute has a fundamental misunderstanding of the 2nd Circuit ruling. For those that are interested, here’s a quote from the WaPo article:

It always circles back to the warlords, like the ones we worked with when we first dropped in the ODA’s after 9/11. I remember on a project I worked on at an old job about the ones that were inserted in the north, ended up meeting up west of Mazar with the warlords they were working with and them wondering how that…

This article explains how they played the game yet their responses show they are still playing. They use semantics and an excuse of “joking” in the same way they used codes in the email. I could have written these responses without looking at them because the article points out that deniability was the goal. This is…

Bari Weiss and Brett Stephens would like to remind you that while this is all certainly unfortunate, some people on the left have suggested the Israeli government is doing bad things, and as such the problem really lies on both sides.

That’s A’lar, but good try.