The term “Judeo-Christian” was invented in the 1900s for political purposes. It’s not a valid framework except to discuss a sort of chauvinist political ideology.

With a heavily curated feed of mostly experts, academics, and serious analysts you can build something that’s both toxic and informative, and if that’s not damning with faint praise I don’t know what is. Even in such a narrow framework you can’t escape the toxic.

So Rand Paul’s feud of evil with Liz Cheney? He called himself a realist. It happened 5 hours ago looks like, I just saw it on Twitter. A realist! I can’t stop laughing. 

There is a single outpatient psychiatrist in my county of 250k odd people. She’s not very good, and your care will consist mostly of 15 min sessions where she checks to make sure your medications aren’t causing severe side effects. Better hope your insurance will pay for those pointless 15 minutes every 3 months.

Weiss is rabidly racist against Arabs and Muslims and spent literal years trying to destroy professors she deemed “anti-Israel”.

Willfully aligning yourself with harmful power structures, generally as in this case by targeting another minority, fits the systemic issue quite well. Your position seems to rely on the idea that they’ll never fully assimilate to it, but that’s pointless. I will never fully assimilate to the white Christian power…

If you throw meat to racists, you’re racist. It doesn’t matter what color your skin is. You made a conscious choice. “I can’t be a racist because I’m non-white” has become such a weird niche for the tiny fraction of non-white Republicans. I had one pull it with me on Twitter after repeatedly defending Ben Shapiro’s…

“I’m going to donate to an anti-hate charity”

The intellectual rejoinder of someone who can definitely defend his position and isn’t just some racist pissant out to get off on his fleeting and delusional feeling of power for a transient moment as someone, anyone, pays his worthless soulless being a iota of attention.

He was talking about “Judeo-Christian foundations of our society”. He knows exactly what he’s doing.

Fuck off back to your hate site you sniveling incompetent. None of these “suspect” actions are actually suspect, and I can tell you don’t know a goddamn thing you didn’t crib from some neo-Nazi aligned anti-Muslim hate group. The CAIR reference in pretty bloody obvious what conspiracy theory blogs you read.

This is sickening. It’s a plain violation of US law. This is abusing asylum seekers, a heavily protected class under both US and international law.

This could almost be a campaign ad for her. Cramer doesn’t realize that CEOs and big banks and corporations are hugely unpopular in anything but the most abstract terms. People like the abstract idea of capitalism, they don’t like the reality, and the number of people who plan their votes based on who is friendliest…

I don’t know, while there’s definitely some in the blob who support those things, there’s a lot of others in the foreign policy community who oppose the broad AUMF and its usage, the war in Yemen, and military aid to human rights abusers. Even if you’re talking about State, though aren’t uncommon opinions. It’s really…

Cost-benefit analysis makes me think otherwise. The value of a UK in the EU, especially after all the chaos, probably outweighs any desire for retribution beyond some symbolic actions or minor substantive actions.

Shock to the head from that angle is tough. The neck isn’t really designed to stop shock from the top. The guys on the broadcast had it right; that’s a worrying hit. Not intentional or anything, but it’s dangerous. Humans, in general, aren’t great at absorbing force from that angle. The helmet probably helped, but a…

The EU gains nothing from Brexit. If, a big if, there’s a plausible attempt to revoke Article 50 plus possibly a few concessions as well, probably more on the symbolic than substantive side, the EU would probably take it. They are pissed, and they’ve got a right to be, but the hard fact is that a UK in the EU is…

Answer. The. Question.

Answer the question you worthless troll. I never said I like the Lib Dems. I correctly noted they have taken an anti-Brexit position Labour had failed to claim. That’s indisputable fact. 

When, precisely, did Corbyn commit to “preventing Brexit”? Give me a date and citations. He’s been the one claiming Labour needs to support Brexit because of a non-binding referendum!