....You didn’t read my comment did you. Here, I’ll copy the relevant portion.

Where there’s racist trolls, you always show yourself. Here to revise history to suit your political prejudices once more? Or are you doing the pseudo-reasonable thing this time? 

No, it didn’t. I don’t know how your racist pissant ass got out of the greys, probably the other racist trolls here today, but this is a naked lie.

Married them, according to the story. If you’ve read the other comments you’re probably aware Livy isn’t the most reliable narrator, but I do think the “lured them with promises they reneged on” is more likely than mass sexual assault and forced marriage. I’m not aware of any recorded events like that, though…

You have a tendency of writing false things, and ignoring them would misinform others, which I find unacceptable. Though in this case, I just thought it amusing how made it all about yourself.

An Israeli official has already stated they did it because of Trump. That could be an attempt to shift the blame and cover for Netanyahu, but it’s not easy to dismiss. I’m also pretty confident in my read of internal Israeli politics. I’m not an expert, but I’ve been watching in a lot more detail than most people for…

Yes. The legal situation is far clearer than a few dishonest “pro-Israel” legal scholars like to claim. Go back to whatever racist cesspit you slithered out of.

Way to make this all about you. Trolls are trolls I suppose. 

I know there’s value in dunking on the dishonest troll to inform others, but this one is pretty useless. Probably worth dismissing after this comment.

Even AIPAC has expressed mild disagreement with this decision. I think Netanyahu may have backed himself into a corner. The far-right demanded this, and would attack him if he didn’t do it, but now he’s struggling with the blowback, which can harm his “I’m the best leader for Israel abroad” line. 

Dear Gods, how many bigoted trolls are going to crawl out of the woodwork to try and lecture me with comically bad understandings of international law and political theory today. I feel like I’m teaching an intro course to a bunch of smarmy white teens that read Wikipedia and think they’re experts.

Alright, dismissing the troll after he went full in on fascist “the state is the people” nonsense. Take a remedial political theory course and some intro IR and IHL courses then come back. 

This thing where you completely ignore the substance of my comment to fall back on your misleading position is very trollish. If you don’t want to be dismissed I’d suggest not doing it.

It is ironic when you try and “own” me but turn it into a self-own. Note in your own bloody comment “human right”. A state is not a human. A “right to exist” does not exist for a state. You’re conflating that with a completely different right, self-determination, which I’d bet money I’ve had to do much more research…

Dropping bombs on apartment buildings, leaving Gaza under a siege so severe most people do not get the adequate number of calories, and violent raids that arrest children at 3 am to keep the occupied population from a state of normality are not “restraint”.

No, PR line. State to state recognition has nothing to do with a “right to exist”. The Palestinians recognized Israel in ‘93. While the term “right to exist” was used a bit in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, there is no such right in international law and the view and theory of the state then is significantly…

There’s a solid argument against all of this, and Warren proxies and her campaign need to make it. Her polling numbers have been slowly rising. It’s not debate bump. I don’t think it’s just name ID either. The more people see her, the better she does. If that’s not “electability” I don’t know what is.

How the hell is this pissant out of the greys? This troll popped up recently and now it’s everywhere. 

Bibi only cares about Bibi. It’s not what Trump said that caused it, but the reaction to his flank. He’s feeling more and more vulnerable because he started as a solid right politician in Israel and now is probably one of the most liberal members of the Likud. He grew the far-right and it wants to replace him.

Neither of them have “statutes”, you fundamentally don’t understand the nature of pre-modern law. Norse law wasn’t even generally written down. Early Irish law was, but it’s incredibly complex and far beyond your ability to parse when you know nothing about the society in question.