This brings up an interesting dilemma...
gcodori
gcodori
The real reason this was not used in a wider sense was this:
Bernie would have lost to Trump - even worse than Clinton.
All this shows is that a Republican is more likely to vote down the party ticket, regardless of the quality of the candidate. Democrats were splitting votes (anger, spite, etc). The electoral vote confirmed that talk (and polling) is meaningless, and Repubs will always vote repub no matter how vile the person.
Kindle has been updated to 5.3.2.1 on 12/24/16 and has removed much of the rooting options from the table - also will brick the device if you want to roll back to the prior version - please visit XDA for more info. This article will need to be updated.
Female competitive (professional/olympic) is about on par with junior high/high school boys performance.
So sad that Kevin HAD to say this. Even he knows that the refs control the pace and potential outcome of the game. **cough game 6 and 7**
Correct! Most of the tests are there to agitate you and make you do or say something that puts the officer on alert. Most cops know in the first 2 minutes whether you are going to jail - everything else is just salt on the wound.
It all points to being impaired. The “impaired” thing is purposely left vague.
Most places have done away with the phrase “drunk Driving” due to the assumption that this only covers alcohol. Most states have replaced drunk with “impaired.” This allows them to cover more than drinking. Also note that smoking pot can be covered here too, legal or not (CA is already running ads saying that “yes…
As a citizen of CA I can confirm that DUI can be from anything - the I stands for Influence (Caffeine, drugs, emotion, etc).
But of course there’s NO WAY a ref can control the pace, limit player performance or dictate in some way the outcome of a game.
Few problems with these - except the XWD system that breaks down unless you change the fluids every year or so it seems. Hopefully that used AERO has receipts for that work being done.
It’s just another example of a company saying “Do what I say but not what I do”
I said this in the last thread about this car - this is basically setting a precedent that owners will be forced to keep the cars in great shape as VW will want to profit from either reselling them later or selling the parts themselves.
As a person of Maltese harriage - I can confirm that Libyans defect to Malta on a regular basis. Why not? It’s a beautiful country.
The bigger issue here is that the judge is basically saying:
I would buy another in a heartbeat (I’d love to get a gently used A7 TDI that someone sells back).