Maybe watch the first couple episodes again, I may too. But from what I remember, the sheriff was positive he was guilty and Amantha yelled at him pretty good for following them around. I think the sheriff used the safety thing as an excuse for harassing them.

I can't find anything to verify that either, so I guess we'll just have to wait another year to find out everything (sigh). I just know Foulkes was involved and whatever it is, it can't be good. I think Trey is more guilty of covering (whatever) up and being a total ass than being directly involved in the crimes.…

I'm not sure how he knew, but I'm going to watch that episode again. He said "her uncle" it didn't sound like it was any relation to Trey. That's where I got the idea that the uncle Trey was talking about was Foulkes because Foulkes needed a scapegoat for something (either for Hanna's murder or to get rid of Hanna for…

For such a slow moving show it's amazing what I can miss. Lucky to have Netflix as I find myself watching many episodes over. One that I intend to watch again is the episode with Trey & Daniel in Georges trailer when Trey goes over family history. That's when Trey made the comment that her uncle had already "got to…

Susan reminded me that Chris is Foulke's nephew so Foulke's could be covering for him or someone else either in the present or the past, or either did it himself. He needed a scapegoat and it was Daniel. Most murder mysteries have a "law & order" type ending and it's never the most obvious such as Trey. Since Chris…

I got that backwards. I thought he said that Amantha deserved to have someone not so distracted (by Daniel's case). It seems I have to watch each episode over again (not a chore at all lol). I am going to watch the whole trailer scene again where Trey was explaining that whole messed up family ties thing, who was who…

I can't get rid of the feeling that Foulke's had something to do with Hanna's rape when she was 13 because there is usually a reason that a little tidbit like that is introduced into the story. I always thought that Trey brought that up to Daniel because the writers wanted us to know why Hanna may have been a little…

I don't think they would do that. I like the way they turned the sheriff from a real ass into a good guy trying to find the truth. I have always thought the senator was guilty.

As far as the dna the sheriff said that they still didn't have the technology to separate the large sample. George's must have been the only one they had a good enough sample.

That just answered my question about the senator. I didn't know that Chris was his nephew and have always thought the senator did it or was covering up for someone and didn't want it to come out because of his political aspirations. He wanted to be senator and that would have interfered.

George wanted to confess to the rape because at the time they thought it was Daniel and it was part of why they charged Daniel with the murder. Evidently back then there was no sophisticated dna testing. As for the senator, I still think he was involved in Hannah's rape when she was 13 or knew something about it.…

Wouldn't it be poetic justice though, if Trey got put on death row for something he didn't do, after torturing Daniel about that very same thing.

I still would have thought that the terms of Daniel's probation would have been used by Jon and Amantha as a big part of their campaign to dissuade him from accepting the plea deal, impressing on him the fact that he would never be truly free if he took the deal. Yes, we are to assume that Jon and Sondra explained all…

No one has been thinking Trey didn't know, but that was the first time Trey intimated to Daniel that he knew he was innocent. That's if the scene was real. Good chance Ginny's right and it was just his subconscious. I guess I still think the first part was a dream and the kitchen scene was real, but not sure. Remind…

He would have to use the hypothetical, otherwise he would be incriminating himself saying right out that he knew Daniel was innocent. That's the type of language he would use if he were trying to get under Daniel's skin, without coming right out and admitting that he knew what happened.

I guess it's because I thought at the time that Trey's purpose was to provoke Daniel into assaulting him so he would get thrown back in jail, and to throw in the part that it must be hard being locked away for 20 years for something you didn't do. If the scene was real, that made it clear that Trey knew Daniel was…

I think if Trey planted the gun then, we would have seen him do it. But where else would he plant it to incriminate Daniel. It will be interesting to find out why Trey has it out for Daniel if Trey isn't the murderer as I don't think he is because he's too obvious.

I'm going to watch that part again. I'm not really sure either way, but the kitchen scene was so typical of jerky Trey that it looked more real than an hallucination.

I agree, however they are all so good (and the writers) I have a hard time choosing. Even Daniel many times makes you love him and then two seconds later does something so breathtakingly stupid but understandable that you say you have got to be kidding. At that point you have to remind yourself "it's only a tv show".

I can't help but feel sorry for Teddy even though he is like he is. His whole world turned upside down when Daniel got released, then Janet asks him not to call her mom, then his wife falls for Daniel. Then his sad childhood is revealed.