Yesterday, I saw a twitter reply to a guy supporting feminism, from a guy that likely does not support it, that (roughly) read: “Supporting feminism means you’re a beta male. You’re not a man.” and I find it really funny, in a terrible way, that supporting equality means you’re some kind of ineffectual, emasculated…

They are fully invested in a society, culture, and economy of male dominance going back....oh, four thousand years or so. So any perception of an argument against that dominance causes them (well, us...well, those other idiot bros) to flip out.

I grew up in my crucial teen years with just a father. He never told me what it was to be a man or how I’m supposed to act. My brother wore dresses all the time. So I guess I grew up privileged and lucky that I was never put in a box. I’m pretty soft, I am emotional and touchy feel. I hate when people tell me to “man…

I’m not sure. Then again I don’t consider myself a manly man. I’m 30, I still don’t even feel like a man, I feel like I have a lot more growing up to do. The whole MRA thing and male ego, I don’t get at all. I can’t even explain it. Maybe if I liked sports I’d get it, I don’t know.

He parodies himself. You don’t even need to write jokes about him, the comedy is just there.

Or Obama or vaccines or whatever else we blame things on now adays.

In The New Jim Crow, the author argues that the policy of color blindness is part of the problem in the US. We all know that whole “mentioning race is racism” schtick. She’s very convincing.

From your keyboard to Kinja's ears

Just do it the European way. Say a lot more racist things openly, but stop killing and imprisoning black people.

Portland. By design.

Portland Oregon

you got thin skin

Can we have a new rule that in order to call yourself a comedian you have to, you know, actually be one?

But seriously, who downloads a porn app? Just visit Porn Hub on an incognito tab where you can browse through millions of free stuffs to make your panties (or boxers) wet.

Beyoncé owes her enduring popularity to “white girls”?

hahahahaha, okay, pal

1.) The whole “theme” of the video is that it’s a what 30s/40s movie shoot. Unfortunately, that means black directors or film crew workers would have been non-existant anyway.

What do you believe mentioning this achieves? Do you think this recontextualizes his rhetoric in a way that should change its reception? Honest questions.

100% admission.