Billy Eichner and funny don’t belong anywhere near each other in a sentence unless that sentence also includes the words, “is not” directly before funny.

Frankly, I can’t wait until someone punches Billy in the neck. Come onnnnnn 2017. Momma needs a pick-me-up.

No, no, Nicki: original is accurate.

So, based on the excerpt in the article, he seems to be ok with gay porn as long as it doesn’t depict violence or underage actors.

Not to shame women who do porn, but it would be interesting to hear Republicans in favor of this measure defend their incoming first lady who has done tons of nudes.

Porn featuring performers of legal age who look very young and are presented as children isn’t just legal, it’s very common. They aren’t actual children, but the narrative and visuals present them as both children and sex objects, and very deliberately so.

People have been trying to connect regular porn to the production of child porn for a while so this tactic is nothing new.

Marshall apparently believes that porn could be as dangerous as cigarettes, but the effects can only be understood if studied at length.

“Pornography treats women *and children* as objects.”etc. This is the bit that is pretty concerning, to be quite honest. Child porn is *already* illegal. This links adult porn with child porn in a way that is a: hugely inaccurate and b: could set a precedent for future legislation.

Lol. It has no proposed ‘solution’ cause if he tried one it would be political suicide. Republicans looove their porn. Particularly the kind that’s demeaning to women.

Marshall apparently believes that porn could be as dangerous as cigarettes, but the effects can only be understood if studied at length.

“He’s right; pornography does have a negative impact on public health, and it does lead to lots of other issues. I’m going to look at it.”