gawkerbup
Gawkerbup
gawkerbup

As a parent this is my worst nightmare. But, if he completed his sentence, are we complaining about the sentence being too short/weak or are we basically giving up on people being able to rehabilitate themselves and living their lives. Even teenagers.

He was a minor

Glad you guys are enjoying it, because it has ruined the NBA for the rest of us. I’d be fine if other teams at least had a chance like the last 2 years, but this team with Durant has rendered watching the NBA Playoffs joyless for the rest of us. It is simply not enjoyable anymore, and I’m a Sixers fan who was fine

I really seems like the NYT’s policy is a pretty good compromise. Writing a sentence like “They is an award-winning singer” is confusing as all hell and apparently ungrammatical on its face unless the reader is actually aware that the signer in question prefers “they” or “them” instead of a gendered pronoun (unless

And there’s always some one like you whose mad at me. Get over it sweetcakes

Annnnnnnd....

Because paying someone $7.50 an hour is bad for the economy and the country. If every corporation started paying their employees more, we’d see a huge boom in economic growth. The poor and middle class do not hoard their money like the rich do, but pump it right back into the economy. It’s why welfare is actually very

nyawww looks like someone needs his Dismiss button safe space

Tha Jaguars drafted a WR with a scetchy private past in the 4th round because of Trump? They wouldn’t have drafted him with Clinton as president? Um, mkay.

On one hand, a guy hasn’t been convicted or even charged if anything. He’s free to seek employment and teams are free to draft him.

There is a reason for statutes of limitations, and it’s not to protect criminals. It’s to protect the innocent. I’m not sure how long it should be, but I’m a bit disappointed by the knee-jerk responses. And as a lawyer, I can tell you that the presumption of innocence is a crock. And so is beyond a reasonable doubt.

Naw. The net result of all this in 2017 is that more people hear Ann Coulter’s message and more of them are likely to view her as somewhat sympathetic because she can occlude her real values behind being a free speech martyr to some segment of people who otherwise would either not give a shit because they aren’t all

That’s great in theory, but we are where we are. Whatever could have been done to shut a person like Coulter down a long time ago is only interesting in a theoretical discussion.

As I’ve mulled over the Ann Coulter incident, I actually think Berkeley’s kiddos are just playing into her hands.

I’m not wondering how to help this individual. He created this mess for himself.

He was here on a work permit, and convicted of a crime directly related to the work he was doing. The Obama administration chose not to fully enforce the terms of his stay, but the Trump administration has.

Not a fair comparison. At least Rosa Parks was offered different accommodations on the same bus.

This feels really icky and exploitative regardless of his other work. Sorry. And, there is really no way to tell if it was this or something else on the application that got him accepted, and it’s many times more likely that it was something else.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt believed in genocide for people with disabilities.

Considering Trump made a mockery of her husband’s ultimate sacrifice by crowing about how much applause he got I’d say 45 did a great job of disrespecting the war widow.