I enjoy and have most of their games but I fully agree.

Sure he uses some purple prose, but his criticism is valid. I interpret that he’s just disappointed by the lack of depth in the story.

Agreed. Its phenomenal how Nathan Grayson has used a controversy centering around him writing positive reviews of his sexual partners games to shame so many others. Hell, he profits off GamerGate, because putting GamerGate in the titles of articles guarantees clicks.

A third Team Fortress game would be crazy fun.

Jim Sterling summarized this pretty well;

I really ant to be excited about this, but this doesn’t feel like that great of an ARG.

The aesthetic looks a lot like Dirty Bomb met Overwatch.

Pretty sure that eleven year old isn’t a part of GamerGate, you can dislike buzzfeed and their writers without being apart of that crowd.

For those of you who are a tad confused, the jokes here are very centered around Dunkey’s actual youtube journey.

How is Gamergate involved in this?

Looks Awesome!

The anatomy in these pieces could really use some work!

...

Careful Jason, don’t be too critical of Blizzard properties, it might upset Kotaku’s Overwatch promotion campaign.

Edit: Turns out Metacritic has some beef with Kotaku? Maybe that’s why.

Asking what GamerGate is on Kotaku is like asking about black people in the heart of a Georgia trailer park.

Coincidentally;

Why is this a bad thing?

What about producers like Chucklefish, where most of the games they produce already have full teams themselves and they often produce other small studios’ games?

I think people are getting mad here because a lot of players like to identify as their character. Games like Mirror’s Edge or Portal can get away with this because they’re first person, and games like Tomb Raider have their female characters integral to the story. But in multiplayer games, there are strong urges to…