Okay, I’ll just let the OP’s explanation stand for itself.  You’re being deliberately dense and I don’t know what you think you’re getting out of it.  

I think you’re failing to distinguish between value and value proposition.

I will say that while I agree they’re both obviously fucked up, I find it a little sickening that it seems like a lot of people and certain media outlets want Heard to be a “perfect victim,” and since she isn’t and clearly has issues, this must mean she is just as bad or deserved it or whatever. I mean, if I was raped…

Sorry that's just not correct given the CEO literally commented on a post about whether they would be muzzled. Literally using the term muzzled.

Not only has no one ever silenced the voices of anti-choicers, anti-choicers have always literally killed pro-choicers and are about to get rid of a person’s right to their own uterus (not very pro-respect!). Ryan is absolutely wrong in his implied false equivalency.

So how many hours a day should I spend defending my right to exist before I’m allowed to accept that people demanding my death are just as entitled to have their opinion heard as I am to have my existence acknowledged?

Because it’s not being neutral. Being neutral means not getting involved. Inserting yourself in the middle and telling people to respect other peoples views isn’t taking a neutral position because there’s the implication that their views are worthy of respect. 

It should be obvious that “difference of opinion” is a thing that has limits. Like if I argue “we should hunt down, kill, and eat Playstation President Jim Ryan” and he thinks that sounds unconscionable, what we have is not a “difference of opinion” I am just acting like a maniac in this case.

It might seem that celebrity Scientologists are naive or misguided, but it’s all an act designed to protect their place in pop culture.

No, that’s going pretty extreme and taking my argument completely out of context, really. A spoiler warning is sufficient, maybe rewording the header and choosing a different picture. How about a picture of the actual fight, and maybe rewording it to be “A surprising time loop may let raiders save a certain beloved Hea…

The very simple reason why OP stuff in PvE-only games gets nerfed is because it makes the game more fun. Not even kidding.

I think you’d be surprised just how much of a cultural moment JK Rowling’s attack on transpeople was for younger people, at least in the UK (trans-rights in the last two-three years has basically become the major generation dividing issue in terms of social views in the UK now).

Let me be very clear: I have no real idea what the hell Amouranth does. She streams a ton, has other businesses on the side, and makes a lot of money. A lot of people talk about the boobs, and sexy girls are indeed sexy, but I can’t imagine that boobs are interesting enough to follow and watch that much of her in a…

So what you are saying is you are incapable of utilizing this very good advice, because you have a very, very narrow point of view: “The real lesson is to find a thing that is nascent enough and perceived to be uncertain and risky enough as to offer you outsized rewards for a modicum of professionalism.”

Hey bro, you have completely and utterly misunderstood a very simple thing. In this situation, Twitch is the nascent platform, and “legacy media” is the many different forms of television. Right now, nearly the entire whole of Twitch is: Random person tries a thing, and it either works or it does not. This is not, for…

I think Artifact let you sell cards to other players for real money, if that’s what you mean. I also don't see why you need NFTs to do this.

Wild. This is almost nonstop praise with roughly three sentences of criticism gently couched in credit to the series’ originality and of course the top comment is “Well someone who *loves* the series loves it with no reservations whatsoever”.

The fact that this happens in lots of places is exactly the problem. And the fact that you are okay with it and you work in the industry makes you a part of that problem.

Everything you say would make sense, except that THERE WERE MULTIPLE PEOPLE WHO CAME FORWARD BECAUSE THEY WERE HURT BY THIS WORK ENVIRONMENT. I’m writing this in all-caps because it was apparently very easy to miss.

Your two paragraphs were like it’s not a big deal for your boss to call one of his employees retarded so it wasn't especially difficult to make that assessment