And what is it when someone forgoes sarcasm entirely and just calls you a coward and a lickspittle directly to your face?

Wow so brave

The only reason people are leaving disappointed is because they’ve ascribed this genius quality to Star Wars that was never there. The franchise has always been hokey and badly-to-OK written. The movies are fun, but it’s not Shakespeare and I’m not sure when or why we all started thinking that they were.

People are…

You guys need major therapy for your KK Derangement Syndrome

It sounds absolutely horrible. If the game cannot be understood through playing it, it is fundamentally broken. Datalogs/lore dumps/reading a wiki should be to enhance the storytelling, not substitute for it.

They didn’t. People have lost their fucking minds with this. It’s very normal to say when you started to see the cracks in retrospect, but the day you realize your original vision probably isn’t going to pan out, you don’t go running to the press like “actually we fucking suck.” Trying to figure out a way to make the…

I get why people are mad, and even why they feel misled, but I really don’t think there was any deceit or subterfuge or whatever people wanna ascribe to the overall debacle of OW2. I think the reality is in fact considerably sadder than that: they simply don’t have the juice anymore. They had a plan for a game that a…

There was nothing to purchase friend, except for a veteran unlock and cosmetics bundle that were irrelevant anyways if you were an OW1 player. People have rewritten history to invent all these OW2 “buyers” expecting PvE, but that doesn’t exist.

You mean someone like Bernie Sanders, an elected official, who has repeatedly endorsed antichoice candidates because “class” was the “larger issue?”

Uhhh... a literal child could script “AI” for this game. Floating the idea that they “did a bad job” when they’ve created one of the most popular mobile games in years (which also has bot opponents that play much better than Agatha) makes you look like a total moron.

?? At no point in the article, either this one or the full Eurogamer interview, do they say they ever even tried to give this card an AI beyond randomness. Or say that it’s because she’s “chaotic.”

Sounds like you’ve got a problem, bud.

“Wasting money”? Okay, I guess you don’t actually play Snap, because there’s no way to “waste money” to acquire the card. Agatha is Series 3, so you can’t control when you unlock her, unless you use your monthly Series 3 unlock to get her, which is ALSO totally free.

It’s not a positive playstyle for the game, so they’re extremely unlikely to ever improve it. It’s just interesting enough to get people excited to try weird things while not being so interesting that it gets played all the time. I think they’ve balanced it perfectly.

analogies aren’t your strong suit huh

Yes.

This is like the “criminals will just get guns anyway” argument. Sure, there will always be a couple that slip through, but an overwhelming amount of the time these rules are effective.

This sucks so, so much. I will miss Waypoint Radio most of all. I hope eveyone lands on their feet and keeps doing stuff where I can continue to follow them.

“Those things... are very much connected. More food makes you bigger. Bigger people die faster.”

Also, a fair amount of them seem to be closeted homosexuals as well.