lmao.

Ah, I did not know that. Thanks!

Antagonistic means you’re purposefully saying things to create an irate response and not with the means of informing or having meaningful discussion. For example, check your other comments.

I guess I just don’t feel it accurately addresses the middle ground in a substantive way.

I think your antagonistic nature is projecting, honestly.

The first suggestion doesn’t account for the people who are upset don’t like the RNG nature of said loot boxes. All you’ve effectively done is raised the RNG changes of getting a limited item that you want but users still can not directly buy the limited edition item without suffering from RNG.

Everyone, please ignore this account. S/he’s purposefully stirring users up. If that wasn’t evident by calling out someone in an entirely new thread just to bring awareness to Realzi’s special opinion.

You don’t think the Witcher series uses previously accumulated funds either via old games, DLC or other methods of obtaining revenue to invest back in itself therefore having enough money to do a cost-benefit analysis of what amount of money to spend on their end, and in what, will net a higher profit down the road?

Yep!

As opposed to this entire comment?

It’s a blip of information. This is a gaming aggregation site. It’s neat but not particularly unexpected or newsworthy.

I’m with you, I often walk with my SO and her niece and nephew just for the excitement of it. But I can also see how people who are less casual viewers of the game than us can be upset about changes in major functionality.

It removed a major functionality of the game, while shutting third-party methods of addressing said functionality.

Mines at 30 for other reasons, but to avoid the screen time-out I had to disable my lock screen. :(

Yeah, I wasn’t saying it’s the best measure, but until the time of which something is of much better use to us, the consumer, it’s an alternative to having to have it directly in your hand at all times.

Every once in a while, it’s a shitty alternative to having Pokemon Go in use while not being attached to your phone, but it’s an alternative I suppose.

Yeah it doesn’t do a great job of explaining it’s own features. For Gyms I recommend fighting simultaneously with friends, or just throwing all your pokemon at it if they’re too high of a level for you.

If you want, you can turn on battery saving, which just means turning it upside down blackens the screen while allowing you to put it in your pocket. That way if you’re not too worried about missing a pokestop, your phone will just vibrate whenever a pokemon pops up.

I do rather like this method of syncing it with a…

Ah okay, thank you for the correction and the information.

I’ve got to ask: