No but I have been experimenting with Valium in their apple juice.
No but I have been experimenting with Valium in their apple juice.
Fair enough. In fact, I think we're on two different pages. I think you're talking about people you interact with socially and have history with. I assumed you were just talking about anyone anywhere. Like some blogger you stumbled onto can just be dismissed with certainty.
I think you're confusing internet population trends with actual individuals. Most SJWs do actually have a single cause that they stick with. Sometimes the interwebz jump on board and involve lots of people who are open to any cause. That doesn't change anything. I mean, to be a warrior, you have to be a little…
There's a huge irony in your last sentence.
But how do you determine which is which? And what value does your determination have for anyone but you?
Where do you see someone asking for it here?
Then what does it take for it to be okay with you for someone to be interested in topics of social justice? Does everyone with a tumblr need to apply for your permission to address social issues? How do you determine which are which? Do tumblrs now come with excessive amounts of personal details about someone's…
"Roswulf came out of his safe space"
Are you saying if you'd like a social change, you either have to dedicate your entire life to it or abandon it? That seems . . . impractical.
I'm still not sure why the idea of "safe space" is so often ridiculed. Do you, by any chance, go out of your way to invite groups to follow you around and harass you at work and home? If not, aren't those your safe spaces? Or do you feel you don't actually have that right?
You stole that approach from Cosby.
Funny thing about common courtesy, it's completely relative. I don't find it very courteous of folks to hijack comment sections in order to whine every time some website they didn't have to read implies a plot point from a television show they didn't have to watch. I can't even begin to explain how little I care and…
I can't disagree with this more. The only time I feel there is any obligation of anyone to prevent spoilers is in one on one communication. As in, I should check with you if you are caught up before I tell you Oswald shot Kennedy.
You guys in Canada are so quaint. Once you catch up to us Americans, you'll realize a proper government IS the heads of foreign companies.
Amelie strikes me as the type who will decorate her home almost exclusively with her own wedding photos.
Hmm, I didn't see Kermit as jealous so much as Kermit pissed off that his employees showed up late and useless. I might have missed a line, but still: I'm not saying he can't be a manipulative jerk, just that manipulating the people you are paid to manipulate in order to get results doesn't require being jealous so…
And he's back y'all, and he's back y'all, and he's backer than back and he's back y'all —CB4
I gave up last week. The acting on whomever plays the FBI agent took a nosedive then. Glad to see this week doesn't encourage a return.
Is Dave Foley doing the voice of her mother? Cause that sounded like Dave Foley in drag. Well, vocal drag I guess.
Sometimes. For example, glancing through the headlines early this morning, I thought, oh What's on Tonight features Jane the Virgin, so probably just Gotham like last Monday.