saleing*

How many times does Burneko have to point it out? He’s not asking for political bias or opinions or dissertation on the 2 party system.

This is pretty funny, considering that, so far as I can tell, nobody at Deadspin has ever written anything that wasn’t negative about Hillary.

No. The suggestion that people should vote for a candidate whose policy positions and record are repugnant to them, simply because that candidate has made them sufficiently fearful of all possible alternatives, is repulsive.

I’m not saying her logic is faulty. I’m saying it’s repulsive. It’s the logic that has permitted one of the two parties to define itself by the narrowest possible marginal differences between itself and the other for more than 20 years—since Hillary’s husband won in ‘92, in fact—meeting the interests of its putative…

No I’m not. In fact, I’m not rendering an opinion on whether anyone should or shouldn’t vote for Hillary Clinton, at all. I’m just pointing out that the logic of her argument is, “Demanding a candidate who represents your interests is for the rich; everybody else has to take what the process gives them; therefore you…