"Hannah got someone to sacrifice his idol for her and the tribal before that, she got her alliance to go to rocks to save her. That to me is a strong social game."
"Hannah got someone to sacrifice his idol for her and the tribal before that, she got her alliance to go to rocks to save her. That to me is a strong social game."
Even if he didn't trust her, I doubt that Ken still wouldn't want her in the final three, instead of going in with both Bret and Adam. Because regardless of what the people in this comment section think, it seems pretty clear that no one in the actual game saw Hannah as anything close to a real threat.
"Everyone in the game is choosing between two options decided by the other players"
I mean, yeah, Ken won more challenges than the other two. But what else did he do? Coasted through the game doing nothing while the other people in his alliances did all the work, and his one notable act outside of challenges was nearly fucking up the thing that was going to save his and his alliance's ass, by…
I see a lot of people in this comment section talking about how they thought Hannah should win, and I just don't see it. And I say this as someone who REALLY wanted Adam to lose (but could see that he was probably going to wind up winning once he somehow made it past everything with Taylor relatively unscathed.)
"I did think that final vote was a bit sexist. Hannah got no credit for being on the right side of all the votes."
I don't get how that makes any sense. "You made the wrong choice by voting for me once near the beginning of the game, so now that I've been eliminated weeks later, I'm going to show you how wrong you were by…….giving you my game-changing advantage instead of giving it to the guy who actually had my back."
I think he played hard, generally had a good idea strategically, and seemed like he had a good social game, but when it came down to it, he just always wound up on the losing side of the votes.
Yeah, there's nothing wrong with defending your moves, obviously. The problem was more that she kept defending the same move EVERY time Adam brought it up, which makes her sound too defensive and desperate,
See, I think the opposite might happen with Sandra. Having won twice, everyone will be so united in not wanting her to win again that they just sort of ignore her until you get past the merge. And then eventually people go "Hey, we can't actually let her get to the end" and vote her out with like 6 or 8 people left.
I just don't really see how you could give anyone other than Ken the credit for his decision to turn on David. At least from my view watching the scenes of people trying to talk to Ken, none of them really said anything that he wasn't already thinking about. He already knew that David would win if he got to the…
I don't think interrupting is necessarily bad, but the way Hannah went about it was about as bad as you can do it.
How do you get people to vote out Bret at that point? By saying "If we leave Bret and Sunday together for any longer, they're going to be in total control of the game and go to the final three together. Are you going to bet on yourself being the one of us five that they decide to bring with them?"
"But this finale painted her as a more deserving winner than I would've ever thought she'd be."
"I think Bret would have creamed Hannah in a Jury vote, though."
Eh, from the questions, it seemed to me like it would be an obvious blowout and possible unanimous decision. Michelle (because of her question to Adam) and Taylor (because of how much he hated Adam while he was in the game) looked like the only ones I thought might vote for Hannah, and then maybe Jess throwing a pity…
Nah, that could make people less likely to vote for Jay (knowing that their votes would almost surely be cancelled, which means Jay votes out whoever he wants to, which means they want to work with Jay to vote out David and make sure they aren't the ones going home.)
"Hannah was a good player. A really good player. But it just didn't show
and I feel the jury just did not know her or her game as well."
Yeah, I don't think it's a pity win at all. It was a "make it to the end with two great goats" win.
Goddamnit….. Adam seems like a great guy, and he played a better game than Hannah and Ken, and the whole story with his mom makes it all worth it…………but jesus, his whole thing with Taylor alone should be enough to disqualify anyone from winning. For a solid three or four episodes, he looked like he was playing this…