Even slightly bad-mouthing the jury without proof is not how you do it. They had access...so? Prove it. Access is never enough to prove someone actually did something. If means was enough then god knows how many people would be proven guilty of murder the past 300 years. If you lose, but you don’t have…

You’re reading a bit too deep there.

What are the facts in evidence.

Oh hay.  Maybe you can teach WaPo how to do this shit if you’re that confident.

If this is what you’re truly bitching about here I’m not sure you watched the trial. You might want to update yourself on the facts in evidence.

“Maybe it’s just what I’ve seen anecdotally but I swear in these last how many years before and then following the London trial despite it being “Heard’s victory” you never really actually saw any coverage of her, it was always surrounding him. About him.”

Fairly typical take.  Someone leaks something.  Everyone covers their own asses.

Welcome to the rest of the government.

I’m hardly one to judge, but… oh hell who am I kidding of course I am.  Let’s not mince words, she wasn’t the judge or a juror so not much blood you’re gonna wring out of this boulder as you carry it uphill.

Amber literally made her own memes in this trial and was her own worst enemy.

Dog fight football.  Or so the dialogue goes.  Offense and defense at the same time.

Every lawyer commenting on the idea of Heard appealing is saying she’s going to have to put 10.35 million dollars up on bond if she wants to.  Where that’s coming from, I’m not sure.

The big issue here is her own lawyers introduced social media as evidence so them being exposed wherever they were exposed is now more her own fault.

NO. You said they don’t have to report it. Fine. If they don’t have to report something that looks like sexual assault I’ll accept that.

Apparantly according to Shampyon in Australia reporting Sexual Assault only covers children so uhh...whatever. (Really??  Only required to report sexual assault for children.  Uhh...ok.) We still lack doctor’s reports. I’m not sure why her docter didn’t uhhh...write something down.

So what. You think I’m supposed to believe her when she’s a proven liar?

And yet Depp in any reasonable country gets his day against Heard. A case against the Sun doesn’t stand for that. Especially if the case doesn’t have her deposed and the case against Heard finds she lied under oath in the case against the Sun.

The UK case was not against Heard.

There were two lines in the article as well.  Did you even hear the verdict?