Hmm...doesn’t look like anything to me

*bigly

Yes, this is why I believe Sanders would have lost by a wider margin.

17 million votes for Clinton, 13 million votes for Sanders. That’s a landslide. Democrats overwhelmingly chose Clinton, despite the fact the more extreme left wing folks have a higher rate of participation in the primaries compared to those moderates and independents who only vote in the general.

What happened to DJ Barron and Scott Baio?

She lost by 10,000 votes in MI, 22,000 in WI and 44,000 in PA.

Canadian pharmacists terkin our jerbs

Bro, I’m still on Witcher 2.

Well at least he didn’t claim he was Cherokee.

And what’s worse is when bloggers/journalists do this, then any interesting article about issues we are facing becomes entirely about the silly word with the X.

Nouns in Spanish have gender. This is simply how the language works. It isn’t specifying female or male unless that’s what you are discussing.

How? Can you explain?

On Univision and in Spanish, nobody spells it this way.

Can you explain a bit more? What does it have to do with transgender issues? I guessed that it was something like people not wanting to type Latinos and Latinas, but I really have no idea why people are spelling it with an x.

Who started this ridiculous trend of spelling Latino with an X? Please stop doing this guys.

Life begins to imitate art with Sec of Labor brought to you by Carl’s Jr. Perhaps next year will see the launch of Trumpwater® ...it has electrolytes plants crave!

Yes, far too many on both the left and the right seem to be under the impression this is about hacking voting machines.

Imagine how I feel as a long time conservative with distaste for conspiracy theories and fake news.

Yes, the way it’s used in the headline...did not provide evidence of what, specifically? No evidence Russia hacked or no evidence Russia’s hacking influenced the election / resulted in X number of voters changing their minds etc?

Hannah, I’m disappointed in the clickbait title. Claiming these agencies “did not present evidence” is not merely misleading but untrue. You are spreading same sort of misinformation that drives clicks for conspiracy bloggers and Fox News.