Relevant username.

They're both automobiles that people can buy. I get what you're saying - they're very different cars - but the point of this is to illustrate:

If somebody is willing to pay that $150, why should you get the ride for $30? Supply and demand.

$450,000 - 6 Stingrays for track days with friends

Okay, okay, I get it. It's not a record.

Alright, excluding top fuel dragsters. Haha.

Holy hell.

340 hp/liter. We may have a new record holder (non-production, but still).

Audi RS5. It's not even THAT fast of a car and I was blown away. I can't wait to get behind the wheel of something even faster.

2 Audi's what?

Maybe with your fatty fat pale legs. A lot of guys look damn good in shorts.

Huh. I think it's a decent car. The badge did give me trepidation, and I wasn't ever THAT serious about buying new.

Also 24 M, test drove the Buick Regal GS with the manual. It kinda sucked. I have a GTI now.

Maybe moreso than other most other models.

It's for show, and 650 is a bigger number than 625. Marketing.

I'd put one in the 1970 Silverado.

It's hugely relevant for marketing purposes to number-chasing buyers, who will be purchasing many of these.

Audi calling their 3.0 liter supercharged engine a "3.0T" is pretty stupid.

Matt, here's an article I wrote on that very problem. The securitization of shitty car loans is leading to more and more shitty car loans as these lenders seek more profit from the high-yield loans. It works okay (for the lender) while the economy is doing relatively well, but it is a miniature version of the mortgage…

Nice. But fuck the Red Wings.