futurechildrenstory
futurechildrenstory
futurechildrenstory

You can certainly sell a Rembrandt.

I think she had a different understanding of some things from the visitors. The situation she placed herself in forced her to confront the differences of ideology and just worldview between herself and her audience. It's hard and difficult to face this and still have artistic confidence. It was a situation in which

Mushrooms are the fruiting bodies. The underlying organism is sometimes massive. There seems to be a confusion between the expanse of the mycelium network and the mushrooms themselves.

Also, campaign finance issues.

The artist attempted to hold to the ideal of the project's integrity, indicating she meant for what unfolded to be her creation, whatever it was. And whatever it was as event, it has definite existence as provocative narrative and as seed of secondary artifacts.

Whatever they love, be it art and women, they probably also hate art and hate women.

This is why you become an accountant, who gives a shit about your critically acclaimed game anyway? If you don't make a critically acclaimed game, they'll just acclaim another one, however shit. Problem solved.

I really like the measures suggested in the paper though. The entourage should definitely be culpable and at least logged.

I don't understand the arms race between doping tests and dopers well enough to evaluate the data. It does seem to lend verisimilitude to the idea that some of the runners are clean. The alternative would seem to lead to the conclusion that everyone, Nesta Carter and Leroy Burrell, including presumably everyone at

As a dude, myself, remember the dudes you filter out because you don't want to end the day having punched the shit out of someone? Come on, man. They're out there, and they're outsider enough to be breathing on the back of your neck whenever you're not looking.

I don't think so. We all live in the same society. Real life hasn't become an internet ghetto yet, as far as I can tell. A bit of satire is fine for keeping things in perspective, and also for relieving tensions by making points heard. The particular thing you said is really tame to me, but I guess if you ate kale and

That sounds pretty awesome. I think honesty is the best way to go with parenting. I still disagree with having Creationism taught on an equal footing with scientific explanations of evolution however. But I've made my points and so have you, so let's leave it at that. You haven't responded rudely to any of my posts

So you're in favour of a balanced approach on that front. On the evolution/creationism front, I don't think your position can be described the same way, in the sense that one of those viewpoints is scientific and the other is essentially anthropological. However, as I said, it may help a child be accustomed to its

Congrats, that's good parenting, since your child hasn't become a creationist to spite you. Congrats your child for having you as a parent. Are you a fan of sex education by parents as well, by any chance?

Not really. This is what atheists get all the time, and worse. I don't eat kale or quinoa.

Wow. I like this financial definition of which christian churches are scams.

Hey, come on, it's nothing compared to how bigoted they are against honest, hard-working, money-earning, red-blooded men.

You must be a fan of AIDS.

I know religious people who would crack the same joke about other religions. Are they assholes?

Oh wait, do you hate those shows as well? Of course the answer will be a snide "No".