You got what you want, an enormous amount of this discussion ostensibly about an episode of The Sopranos is now dedicated to your personal beef with the writer of the piece. You can do whatever you want, but I'm kind of hoping that you don't come back next week because this is all very tiresome. If you come next…
Craig
furiousgiorge--disqus
You got what you want, an enormous amount of this discussion ostensibly about an episode of The Sopranos is now dedicated to your personal beef with the writer of the piece. You can do whatever you want, but I'm kind of hoping that you don't come back next week because this is all very tiresome. If you come next…
@avclub-1898a4d76532f237d9b5c0592dfe71a9:disqus
@avclub-1898a4d76532f237d9b5c0592dfe71a9:disqus
It's a lot cooler if you mean it in the dirty way.
It's a lot cooler if you mean it in the dirty way.
Other than Gandhi, I doubt these guys really know him from his movies. Maybe Sexy Beast. They probably mostly know him from reading celebrity gossip rags and watching Entertainment Tonight, where the "Sir" would always be included.
Other than Gandhi, I doubt these guys really know him from his movies. Maybe Sexy Beast. They probably mostly know him from reading celebrity gossip rags and watching Entertainment Tonight, where the "Sir" would always be included.
I wish Chase didn't make her quite so annoying, but I think that it means that when you do a second run through, like @avclub-8b8369fc782a66a1118bd9eda89ebc07:disqus said, you really get a good sense of the correctness of her point of view. On some level you appreciate that she has to be that annoying, because Artie…
I wish Chase didn't make her quite so annoying, but I think that it means that when you do a second run through, like @avclub-8b8369fc782a66a1118bd9eda89ebc07:disqus said, you really get a good sense of the correctness of her point of view. On some level you appreciate that she has to be that annoying, because Artie…
Still with you? Jesus, go away.
Still with you? Jesus, go away.
I will (and have) posited that Charmaine Bucco is the show's one true "good guy" (if you toss out one-offs like the Charles S. Dutton character, people who only interact with this world for an instant, rather than being semi-immersed in it). Her moral compass never wavers, not even for an instant. This isn't much of…
I will (and have) posited that Charmaine Bucco is the show's one true "good guy" (if you toss out one-offs like the Charles S. Dutton character, people who only interact with this world for an instant, rather than being semi-immersed in it). Her moral compass never wavers, not even for an instant. This isn't much of…
That's supposed to be a movement arc. You can see the one on the other side, because the buck is spinning the ball. I admit that that one is kind of confusing.
That's supposed to be a movement arc. You can see the one on the other side, because the buck is spinning the ball. I admit that that one is kind of confusing.
Everything has to be "tough" in sports nowadays. I'ma chalk it up to small wiener syndrome. Here's another good one that the team doesn't use because it's not showing some sort of threat display.
Everything has to be "tough" in sports nowadays. I'ma chalk it up to small wiener syndrome. Here's another good one that the team doesn't use because it's not showing some sort of threat display.
I don't know if you watched Heroes, but it wasn't like that. By the time the 3rd season rolled around, pretty much 100% of it was trash. You just kept thinking that someone, anyone, would find something interesting to say again at some indeterminate point in the future. It was mostly a hostage situation.
I don't know if you watched Heroes, but it wasn't like that. By the time the 3rd season rolled around, pretty much 100% of it was trash. You just kept thinking that someone, anyone, would find something interesting to say again at some indeterminate point in the future. It was mostly a hostage situation.