How bad is it that a large part of me wishes you hadn’t been an ethical person who went on a date and wrote a slice of life article and instead wishes you were a catfish who would use a photograph of Martin Shkreli’s credit card and drivers licence for nefarious purposes.

If this were just about any other victim, these facts wouldn’t be considered proof. Victims recant and change stories under pressure. It’s a know thing that people here generally will defend to the death.

Like, that’s exactly what’s going on in the comments rn

THIS. The cognitive dissonance here today is massively overpowering.

Ask Bill Cosby’s accusers (at least one of which is now proven to be a liar).

Totally right, its only ONE rape. I mean, i’ve only lit one cat on fire, not 40.

Just like the cosby women, right? Ohhhh wait, hes not the untouchable hillary.

Nowhere in the run-up of the album being released/sold did RZA or anyone in Wu-Tang say this was being sold for that amount for any reason on than profit.

I’m a fan of charity as much as the next person, but it’s an asinine notion to think that simply because the person who dropped $2m for a product was a scumbag…

This is an awful lot of special pleading for Bill Clinton. Just own the double standard.

I don’t know either. I can’t even fathom why a victim wouldn’t want to report.

Um, OK, you are for censorship of news based on a political campaign?

I don’t know the dates I was hospitalized for days last year. Though there there’s paper documentation that I could use to find out. That she doesn’t remember the date is not particularly suspicious.

this is such a bullshit response, he was the fucking attorney general at the time. rape is really difficult to prosecute when the perp is a nobody but he was the fucking attorney general at the time. she would have been reporting with the hope that people who worked directly for him would do her justice

The mental gymnastics here are astounding.

Clinton has long been given a pass by the feminist left, for obvious reasons. “He may be a rapist but at least he’s not a Republican. “

Especially when the rapist was literally the attorney general of the state in question. And this was in the fucking 1970s. The odds of that case being thoroughly investigated and/or successfully proescuted are ZERO.

Yeah because accusing the guy in charge of law enforcement in your state of rape is sure to get you a full and fair investigation. I’m sure there would be no shenanigans whatsoever.

Anyone notice a distinct difference in Jezebel tone when it comes to Cosby and Clinton? This reads as extremely dismissive. I guess when it comes to Clinton worship, nothing can penetrate.