Really hope Samsung can figure this out - and really hope that it turns out to be a rare defect in only a percentage of phones.

The boy burned by a phone was burned by a Galaxy Core Prime (removable batteries) and not a Note 7. Can you guys please correct that and stop repeatedly pointing to it as a case of the Note 7 burning up? Thanks.

The boy burned by a phone was *not* burned by a Galaxy Note 7. Repeatedly pointing to that incorrect story is not helpful to anyone.

The 6-year-old boy was *not* burned by a Note 7. How you guys haven’t caught onto this or caught it at all is a little bit surprising. http://www.androidauthority.com/exploding-galaxy-note-7-childs-hands-clarification-716245/

The 6-year-old was not burned by a Note 7. http://www.androidauthority.com/exploding-galaxy-note-7-childs-hands-clarification-716245/

We are how far into this, and otherwise respectable publications are *STILL* reporting incorrectly that a Note 7 burned a 6-year-old boy? Come on, Giz, get your stories straight. http://www.androidauthority.com/exploding-galaxy-note-7-childs-hands-clarification-716245/