As someone who is still in school, I can honestly say that I learn moe from the internet than I do from school, which is honestly sad.

The way public transit works, it is incompatible with rural areas.

This makes perfect sense. He logically could die in prison, and regretting something is called hindsight. It happens to literally everyone at some point.

Once EVs are affordable they will pick up. Americans will always need cars. Our transit system doesn’t function in rural areas. Then there are people who think they are too good for public transit. Then there are people like me, who can’t stand being around a lot of people and hates using public transit.

They would still drive, they’re too good for public transit. Public transit is for poor people and therefore they could not possibly use it. This is a JOKE I am not serious don’t rip me apart, because I know for a fact there will be that one guy who thinks I’m serious.

As long as country exists, Americans will need cars. If you need to go from say Cleveland to Columbus, you can either A: waste money for a flight. B: use a car. Transit systems in rural areas usually only serve to cart around people who don’t have cars. Lots of people have to travel over an hour for work, public…

I would still own a car for 2 reasons

Would those be an issue to remove? Is it expensive to remove stuff like that?

This isn’t just before FCA, this car is also before Daimler. I have no idea if pre-Daimler Chrysler group cars were any good though.

As long as it runs, any car that cheap is a NP.

It’s probably an attempt to compete with Genesis.

Also advertising. Companies advertise CUVs more than small cars, so people who are looking at cars will remember the CUVs and buy one. This is also why the Versa outsells the Yaris and Fit.

A big reason is also advertising. A non CUV example is the Versa. We can all agree that the Fit and Yaris are better, but when was the last time you saw an ad for either of them. The Versa is constantly advertised, which is why it sells. The same goes for CUVs. People see CUVs advertised rather than hatchbacks and…

Of course small teams wouldn’t win. This isn’t old NASCAR, the big money teams get the faster cars. RIP old NASCAR.

BuT We WoUlD HaVe to CLoSe PuMPs WhIch WoUlD MaKe Us LoSe MuNy! lol

The ride height is pointless, it’s not much higher than normal cars, and at the same time it still gets dwarfed by pickups and full size SUVs. Another issue is 2wd models, which eliminates half the point. Crossovers aren’t any better in wrecks either, especially because of trucks and SUVs. If you want to buy a 2wd…

Rollover safety would have been important in the 50s. 50s cars are indestructible unless they flip over. I’ve watched videos and tributes of NASCAR deaths, most of those deaths were because the car flipped over. Modern cars aren’t as bulletproof in collisions, but if they flip over, the roof won’t cave in. These cars…

Because the US is lazy when it comes to making changes. The US is like that one guy who picks up on trends after they were trendy. I’m an American, so I can say this.

I can see that, my mom is gen X, and owned a 79 Camaro. Silent generation likes 30s-50s, boomers 60s-70s, X 70s-80s, Millennials are 90s-2000s, and christ only knows what us gen Zs will want considering our song obsessions seem to include All Star and Take on me. I would take a 60s sports car over a new one…

I do not like crossovers. They are essentially fat, ugly, lifted hatchbacks. They are pretty much pointless.