Ask my family who has been killed by Republican and Democratic presidents in Republican and Democratic controlled Congress sessions.

But to blame Nader is a weak excuse when Gore ran such a poor campaign that he lost 20 times the amount he lost by from his own party.

It’s a vote for the militarism and racism that the DNC has helped prop up throughout American history. This is a fact.

I am an Arab woman born of immigrant parents. Nice of a white person to lecture me about this. Some battles need to be fought.

You don't get to pretend that the moral highground should be silenced and not something to strive for.

And that is a problem. Change needs to happen. We can’t all sit back and be the “moderate whites” of Presidential elections.

Sorry that I won’t want to support a person who approves of the slaughter of innocents. Or one who supports propping up institutions instead of people who need our help.

So you are okay with overly-bombastic, misleading shaming rhetoric?

She used the “putting Trump in the White House” shaming of third party voters. That is disgusting. Samantha is smarter than that and knows better. The Democratic Party does not stand for my ideals. I will not support them for President. I will vote down-ticket for them, but I will either abstain from the President…

Univision isn’t a government entity.

Except the First Amendment isn’t ‘to force entities to publish things they don’t like with publications they own, on their dime’ it’s about government suppression of speech.

First they came for the Anonymous slanderers, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Anonymous slanderer.

We just don’t like them exposing a guy who was a victim of extortion and outing him at the same time, basically because the extortionist threatened to do so. I believe he was the Conde Naste CEO or something.

When you gray out your “unverified” commenters under the guise of gore porn protection, you have very little slack on transperancy issues. It’s not a coincidence all the glowing comments are the ones at the top.

First Amendment protects you from the government, as liberals are always reminding people. Gawker Media is not protected from private entities.

Company censors itself to avoid lawsuits.

Gawker Media disagrees with you and as a result they have folded due to their own mismanagement.

You don’t think a bunch of reporters who support the publication of private sex tapes having their sex acts recorded and published would count as newsworthy?

The moment I saw some of those posts, I knew the company was legally exposed and in for expensive defenses. If those posts were non-negotiable, the company would have little value, would never be bought, and all of these journalists would be out of jobs.

Essentially, the writers of Gawker say it's ok for me to make an internet website posting sex tapes and medical records of Gawker bloggers.