But that’s the thing, we can’t treat people differently because they say they are artists or whatever. We should be worried about people who we have not allowed into the country, wandering off and being in the country anyways.

As someone else already explained, they were past the neutral zone.

The animation style is terrible!

That sounds good, but how could they be prevented from leaving the airport without being detained in some way?

I have eaten their soups, they are delicious.

I’m not talking about getting any more information from the subject of the story. I’m talking about comparing the information already presented with information from OTHER treatment styles. I want information from OTHER sources presented.

And I will point out to you as well that the article doesn’t complain at all…

Where in the story did it say anything about her lack of transparency? Where did she refuse to discuss relapse number? When was she even asked?

They also put meat in most of their sauces.

Pasta really isn’t bad for you. Also, salad is good for you and their soups are not bad either. the bread sticks are the only unhealthy part, really.

And it tastes good!

Whatever measure you think it’s worth, I think it is important to make an effort to compare that with other methods of treatment because such comparisons were rampant in the article in other contexts.

You don’t seem to have understood my point.

Serious question: Are people supposed to ask for ID?

And yet the comparison doesn’t happen with an important aspect. She did nothing to set it up so that we can’t or should not compare success rates. 

I think any sort of comparison would have been meaningful because of how often this treatment is compared to other methods in this story. Even given the limitations. I don’t see those as a legitimate reason to do no comparison.

It just seems one sided to mention that some of her patients died after treatment without some kind of comparison to how many people die after other forms of treatment.

How her success rate compares to other treatment methods is really vital to this story and I’m disappointed those numbers were not included.

I think just chocking it up to laziness is overly reductive and ignores reality.

The problem is you refuse to understand how life can be different for other people.

I never said it wasn’t obtainable. I never even implied it. All I’ve ever said is that it’s not necessarily easy.

How am I looking down on anyone?

It’s less physical effort to not eat. It’s a lot more emotional effort to not eat than to eat. For you that might be easy. For someone else, it may not be. 

Again, it’s simple, not necessarily easy.

You are completely wrong. It is simple calories in calories out. It’s not necessarily that easy to do it.

Mostly, you just like to look down on other people.