Is yours? Do you recall the environment back then? It was primed for someone to have the support (which they did) to push their agendas.

I think a bigger concern is that there are so many people who feel this buffoon is the answer.

And I'm extremely wary of that coming to fruition (don't blow this Hillary), but a combative GOP aren't going to let him have his way. People think he's going to launch nukes. It's not going to happen.

Have you? You clearly have no idea how it came about.

Eh, I don’t want him to win at all (and am legitimately scared as I’ll be out of the country during the election) but this whole “real danger” bullshit vastly overstates the presidents proximate power. Sure, he can screw things up, but he’ll be hamstrung every step of the way but legislature regardless of who…

So just two huge caveats?

“Joe Ricketts believes that Donald Trump is a dangerous, untrustworthy misogynist. But still—better than a woman becoming president.”

Eh, economically he got a shitty deal. So much of that is deferred he’s losing a ton of present value.

Dealers are moving to a “customer satisfaction” model and it really improves the experience. The Internet has caught up to many dealers and they can no longer pretend cars aren't fungible.

O’Connor is the worst. So there’s a zero chance he gave this topic any introspection before jumping feet first into the outrage machine.

The real question is: What did Lance do to Brendan?

While trading up for Goff was a dumb move, I think we all need to take a step back on the rushing rookie QBs to the field. I wonder if Rodgers would have been able to grow into the position if he were thrown to the wolves right away.

When was the last time Nissan made a nice looking car? Their current stylings with excessive lines. Their love of bubbles years after that caught on. They design ugly slabs.

But they do have the resources! Jerry is a billionaire, sure. And maybe he doesn’t have piles of cash sitting around. But as the Marlins have shown us, spending on talent means nothing when you can just hemorrhage it all a year later and get off Scot-free.

I’m somewhat shocked. Tom’s post sort of highlighted the reasons so many thumb their noses at the Gawekerati. Living in this insular world doesn't mean when people have legitimate differing viewpoints they are gaslighted. People had logical gripes long before Thiel, and when we reduce the other side to Him we are…

It's a curious case of being a child. I've yet to meet one that doesn't pull this. Problematic, I'd say.

The question being: is that what we want the site to become? Under new ownership there's little need to spred the past onto the continuing entities. I suppose agree with the sentiment that we should just not click. But that's rarely done much to change what gets published on the web. There's always a mark.

Gawker was a gossip site. Gizmodo might not be a straight news site, but it’s no where close to gossip.

It's weird that you're already the second (?) best guy here.

It all depends on what the definition of “is” is.